- Location
- Massachusetts
But if you were born and raised in Chicago you would be ranting and raving about how bad NM cable is.
I would like to say your wrong but I really don't know.
But if you were born and raised in Chicago you would be ranting and raving about how bad NM cable is.
I would like to say your wrong but I really don't know.
Are they flush and semi-flush all-in-one's that are done that way? I can't really picture how to do a surface mounted one that way.For instance in California it's common for the PVC service riser to come up inside the wall from the slab, and then into the bottom of the "all in one." I thought that was a pretty bad idea but a few million housing units done that way can't be all wrong.
Are they flush and semi-flush all-in-one's?
Sorta. I have 'all in one' as one of the words the macro reader will highlight.You actually read my posts???
Sorta. I have 'all in one' as one of the words the macro reader will highlight.
That is exactly right! For years, the Indianapolis area has prohibited the use of SE cable for service entrance conductors. Since the NEC has become a state wide code, Indianapolis is not permitted to have its own rules and SE cable is acceptable. Since old ideas die hard, we still have very few service entrances done with SE cable. Where it has been done, our connection people and some of our engineers question its validity. :smile:But if you were born and raised in Chicago you would be ranting and raving about how bad NM cable is.