AL Conductors & Use of anti-oxident

Status
Not open for further replies.
infinity

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
dreamsville said:
Pretty cheap protection, and you'll keep the local AHJ happy :)
Click to expand...

That's all well and good but the question here is whether or not it's required and the answer is it isn't. The inspector is wrong for failing this installation because he thinks that it's a good idea or is mistaken that it's required.
 
dreamsville

dreamsville

Senior Member
Location
Michigan
ItsHot said:
"assumption..sumption...whats yo function"? Hey ,I just noticed the first 3 letters in that word! Never really thought about it! I think there is a reason for using anti-oxidant on aliminum conductors, just seems like over-kill on a temp install, and to demand that it be used is a little over the top!!:)
Click to expand...

You know the old saying....ass out of u and me.

I'm not arguing that the NEC does or doesn't require it...just that it does help against corrosion when you have damp humid conditions.
 
I

ItsHot

Senior Member
Location
A little piece of heaven!
dreamsville said:
You know the old saying....ass out of u and me.

I'm not arguing that the NEC does or doesn't require it...just that it does help against corrosion when you have damp humid conditions.
Click to expand...
Not calling anyone here, anything bad!! You guys are awesome!! I could not put a price on the information available here! And I also use anti-oxidant on aluminum conductors on new installs. I just think in the op ,that it is a little picky for a temp service.
 
electricmanscott

electricmanscott

Senior Member
Location
Boston, MA
ItsHot said:
Not calling anyone here, anything bad!! You guys are awesome!! I could not put a price on the information available here! And I also use anti-oxidant on aluminum conductors on new installs. I just think in the op ,that it is a little picky for a temp service.
Click to expand...

It's not being picky, it is a misinformed or ignorant inspector. It is not required, period.
 
infinity

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
electricmanscott said:
It's not being picky, it is a misinformed or ignorant inspector. It is not required, period.
Click to expand...

Well said. That's the bottom line. The inspector violated something that was not a violation in the first place. Arguments about whether or not anti-ox makes for a better connection are moot.
 
texassparky

texassparky

Member
Location
Dallas / Ft. Worth
So in conclusion : We have a wire manufacturer that says it is not required, the Lug listing from the panelboard manufacturer says it is not required, but I have an inspector who "thinks" that it is required, and a very big portion of the electrical community that uses it regardless.

Why can't I come up with a product that is not needed but everyone still buys it !!!!
 
brian john

brian john

Senior Member
Location
Leesburg, VA
texassparky said:
So in conclusion : We have a wire manufacturer that says it is not required, the Lug listing from the panelboard manufacturer says it is not required, but I have an inspector who "thinks" that it is required, and a very big portion of the electrical community that uses it regardless.

Why can't I come up with a product that is not needed but everyone still buys it !!!!
Click to expand...

And when used properly is not a problem.
 
S

SEO

Senior Member
Location
Michigan
I heard of an electrical inspector issue a violation for a little smudge of nolux on the inside of the panel he cited 110.12 (B). I don't know how little the smudge was but it sure seemed picky to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top