I found this in an installer zone on another site. The OP was actually proud of the install. He said the electrician homeowner wanted it there and mounted the dish for him. Needless to say the comments from other installers were not very kind. How many codes broken besides safety issue. If I drove up to this on a trouble call I would take a couple pictures and drive away until I got the Ok to install a new dish at the customers expense then report to the POCO. Does that sound about right.
does this look safe and up to code
- Thread starter jacobsond
- Start date
- Status
petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
It looks like a good install to me unless there is some kind of rule about being away from a stack a certain distance that is not met or there is a rule about not mounting them on a riser.
Neither seems like serious safety problems to me.
Neither seems like serious safety problems to me.
- Occupation
- Licensed Electrician
POCO is the one that would have to red tag it in my area since they are in charge of everything down to the meter.
If I came out on a trouble call I would fix the problem I was told about, leave a bill, and drive away.
If I came out on a trouble call I would fix the problem I was told about, leave a bill, and drive away.
mjf
Senior Member
My local POCO's "Blue Book" states that nothing may be attached to a service mast (besides the obvious-POA, weather head, and any bracing).
petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
I think you would then need to argue that you could not attach guy wires to it then.
Don't think so. The same section states where needed guys may be used.
- Location
- Massachusetts
Same here.
John120/240
Senior Member
- Location
- Olathe, Kansas
Same Here. If it really is a problem, jerry rig a suitable mast off of one of the two plumbing vents.
- Location
- Tennessee NEC:2017
- Occupation
- Semi-Retired Electrician
kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
230.28 definitely applies to this:
Kinda like this........................:lol:
But I think is less clear whether it applies to the dish in the OP. The dish is not a conductor or drop from other utilities like it is for the phone cables in little bills photos. I think maybe 300.11(B) gives us additional leverage to apply here, and would apply even if it were not a service riser.
petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
around here a lot of risers have phone or cable TV cables hooked to them. It does not seem like a horrible thing to me.
kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
Can't use a sewer vent for the satellite dish, you will get crappy reception:lol:
- Location
- Placerville, CA, USA
- Occupation
- Retired PV System Designer
Is that duct tape around the cables at the foot of the riser? Or just roofing cement slapped on?Kinda like this........................:lol:
I do not see that the roofing cement over those cables is doing anything to improve the rain protection of the flashing and drip cap (which look a little flaky too.)
hurk27
Senior Member
- Location
- Portage, Indiana NEC: 2008
Naw just use 810.12, it's a more sure violation:thumbsup:
- Location
- Placerville, CA, USA
- Occupation
- Retired PV System Designer
Nail head, meet hammer. :thumbsup::thumbsup:
kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
Works for me, I wasn't finding anything similar to prevent the telephone service drop being tied to the electric service mast in little bill's images. Maybe I didn't look hard enough?
- Status