You seem to be trying to find something that isn't there.
That's absolutely correct... but I'm fairly certain your perspective is quite different than mine
240.4(G) says Overcurrent Protection for specific conductors shall be permitted to be provided as referenced in Table 240.4(G), which includes motors.
Exactly... and you're saying a feeder with motor(s) and other load(s) is a
specific conductor. Table 240.4(G) doesn't say that. It says, and I quote, "Motor and motor-control circuit conductors". Do you see "other load" or "non-motor load" in there anywhere?
There is nothing in Article 430 that sends you back to 240.4(C).
Exactly... again!!!
240.4 general says, "Conductors, other than flexible cords, flexible cables, and fixture wires,
shall be protected against overcurrent in accordance with their ampacities specified in 310.15, unless otherwise
permitted or
required in 240.4(A) through (G)."
- 240.4(C) says "the ampacity of the conductors it protects shall be equal to or greater than the rating of the overcurrent device".
- 240.4(G) says "Overcurrent protection for the specific conductors shall be permitted to be provided as referenced in Table 240.4(G)."
Its rather obvious which is permitted and which is required. Which has priority?
Note 240.4(C) places a requirement on the ampacity of the conductors contingent on OCPD rating. 240.4(G) only stipulates overcurrent protection.
If you provide your feeder overcurrent protection in accordance with Art 430, you are done, even if the feeder OCPD is larger than 800A.
Certainly, if you totally put on blinders to the nuances I've been attempting to point out.... :blink: