2020 NEC : GEC and bonding screw with “emergency disconnect, service equipment”

3 wire Range and Dryer which cannot originate in a subpanel
Just to be clear everything else aside 250.140 does allow existing range and dryer receptacles to be fed from a sub panel. If its SE cable you apply white tape and land it on the neutral bar.
In the 2023 code they clarified this by adding 240.140(B)(5).
 
Emergency disconnect outside home, has ng bond
But another ng bond in service panel inside home that is issue cause by em disconnect
Everything on the utility side of the service connect is bonded to the neutral, always, EM disconnect or not. I could have 37 metal pull boxes and every single one would be bonded to the neutral.
 
My only concern is that this inspector might argue that my "Emergency disconnect, Not service equipment" might not allow the GEC to originate at this Disconnect. The disconnect is service rated, but only being used as an emergency disconnect.

Whether there is an Em disconnect or not has nothing to do with it. A gec May land anywhere from the service disconnect to the service point. So yes you are free to land a GEC in an EM disconnect neutral bus
 
My only concern is that this inspector might argue that my "Emergency disconnect, Not service equipment" might not allow the GEC to originate at this Disconnect. The disconnect is service rated, but only being used as an emergency disconnect.
I wouldn't assume anything. As electro stated the NEC allows a GEC to terminate at any point from the service disconnect to the service point. Since your EM disconnect is between those two points the GEC can terminate there just as shown in the sketch.
 
Emergency disconnect outside home, has ng bond
But another ng bond in service panel inside home that is issue cause by em disconnect
There is no separate "ground" for the neutral to be in parallel with. Everything is bonded solely by and to the neutral.

The neutral conductor and any metallic enclosures, raceways, meter bases, etc., are all considered to be the neutral.

Only after the main service OCPD is there a separate EGC system. GECs connect directly to the neutral, not the EGC.
 
250.6 is not relevant, any currents on the Utility side of the Service Equipment is not under the NEC.
But it is
See #24 #27 #31. On one hand ng bond in service panel in addition 'em disconnect not service equipment' ok because service conductors to service panel
On other hand feeder
conductors from' em disconnect, service disconnect ' to service panel violate, ng bond presence.
So by manipulating labelling only,
non complaint install made to code complaint install
 
But it is
See #24 #27 #31. On one hand ng bond in service panel in addition 'em disconnect not service equipment' ok because service conductors to service panel
On other hand feeder
conductors from' em disconnect, service disconnect ' to service panel violate, ng bond presence.
So by manipulating labelling only,
non complaint install made to code complaint install
I hate to sound rude but I don't know what you're saying. The Neutral can be bonded to Earth (ground) as many times as you want before the service equipment. In the service equipment you will install a Main Bonding Jumper, after that they will separate.
 
Then after the switch you have a feeder.

This discussion is about 230.85 condition 3
Its a discussion about the mis-application of all of 230.85
In order to use condition 230.85 (A)(3) A "meter main" as the OP stated he is using has to have a marking that no manufacturer I am aware of offers:
"suitable for use as service equipment"
all "meter mains" I see at the supply house and big box stores are marked
"suitable ONLY for use as service equipment".
230.66 requires service equipment to be listed relabeling voids the listing.
The OP has a meter main:
My Case it does - It simply matches the Main Breaker size for the service panel in the garage

My understanding is ED (not service equipment)
In addition there is still the requirement in 230.70(A)(1) often installers mistakenly think a "meter / main" labeled EM disconnect satisfies this section, thats why i call them 3-wire feeders.
The OP states he has
maybe 20' of conduit from outside to the main service panel.
As soon as this conduit is no longer outside the structure per 230.6 230.70(A)(1) applies and a 'service disconnect' is required nearest the point of entrance if that 20' is meets 230.6 then its fine, but a EM disconnect cannot take the place of a service disconnect in that section.
 
Its a discussion about the mis-application of all of 230.85
In order to use condition 230.85 (A)(3) A "meter main" as the OP stated he is using
Where did he state that?
It's not what he shows in post #61
 
Where did meter mains enter the equation in this installation?

On other hand feeder conductors from' em disconnect, service disconnect ' to service panel violate, ng bond presence
Correct if the EM disconnect is also the service disconnect then the conductors after that are feeder conductors and the equipment where the feeder terminates cannot have the neutral bonded. Is that even applicable in this installation?
 
In addition there is still the requirement in 230.70(A)(1) often installers mistakenly think a "meter / main" labeled EM disconnect satisfies this section, thats why i call them 3-wire feeders.
The OP states he has

As soon as this conduit is no longer outside the structure per 230.6 230.70(A)(1) applies and a 'service disconnect' is required nearest the point of entrance if that 20' is meets 230.6 then its fine, but a EM disconnect cannot take the place of a service disconnect in that section.
No Meter main in the equation just a meter enclosure and disconnect inclosure with main breaker in it.

Regarding 230.6(1) - From the bottom of the disconnect I have 1.5" pvc going down under the slab then pop back up in the Garage to the main service panel. So these conductors AFAIK are considered outside of the structure
 
Its a discussion about the mis-application of all of 230.85
In order to use condition 230.85 (A)(3) A "meter main" as the OP stated he is using has to have a marking that no manufacturer I am aware of offers:
"suitable for use as service equipment"
all "meter mains" I see at the supply house and big box stores are marked
"suitable ONLY for use as service equipment".
230.66 requires service equipment to be listed relabeling voids the listing.
The OP has a meter main:

In addition there is still the requirement in 230.70(A)(1) often installers mistakenly think a "meter / main" labeled EM disconnect satisfies this section, thats why i call them 3-wire feeders.
The OP states he has
I don't have a meter main but it's interesting for you to point this out - All the meter mains I have seen are ONLY suitable for service equipment. I believe because you can only have a subpanel downstream (all these meter main combos are factory bonded N-G)
 
B677
Please show any calculations your install complaint nec 250.6
overcome all objections
The main Breaker service panel in the garage is fed by 3/0 L1/L2 and 2/0 N from the "Emergency Disconnect, Not service equipment". All conduit is PVC and the MBJ is in the garage panel. Everything metal upstream from the service panel; in this case the metal enclosure of the service disconnect and meter enclosure is bonded to Service Neutral via SSBJ. Well because that is the only way to bond upstream of the MBJ.

I thank you for your input, I am trying to improve my understanding as when an inspector calls me they basically tell me what to do and I not very often can cite code while I'm in the middle of another job.
 
Where did meter mains enter the equation in this installation?


Correct if the EM disconnect is also the service disconnect then the conductors after that are feeder conductors and the equipment where the feeder terminates cannot have the neutral bonded. Is that even applicable in this installation?
Not applicable in this application because label Emergency disconnect not service equipment only?
 
Top