Attached - 3 wire feed is being done to avoid upgrade of 3 wire Range and Dryer which cannot originate in a subpanelCan you make up a quick sketch, snap a photo and post it?
Attached - 3 wire feed is being done to avoid upgrade of 3 wire Range and Dryer which cannot originate in a subpanelCan you make up a quick sketch, snap a photo and post it?
250.6 is not relevant, any currents on the Utility side of the Service Equipment is not under the NEC.B677
Please show any calculations your install complaint nec 250.6
overcome all objections
Just to be clear everything else aside 250.140 does allow existing range and dryer receptacles to be fed from a sub panel. If its SE cable you apply white tape and land it on the neutral bar.3 wire Range and Dryer which cannot originate in a subpanel
Everything on the utility side of the service connect is bonded to the neutral, always, EM disconnect or not. I could have 37 metal pull boxes and every single one would be bonded to the neutral.Emergency disconnect outside home, has ng bond
But another ng bond in service panel inside home that is issue cause by em disconnect
My only concern is that this inspector might argue that my "Emergency disconnect, Not service equipment" might not allow the GEC to originate at this Disconnect. The disconnect is service rated, but only being used as an emergency disconnect.
I wouldn't assume anything. As electro stated the NEC allows a GEC to terminate at any point from the service disconnect to the service point. Since your EM disconnect is between those two points the GEC can terminate there just as shown in the sketch.My only concern is that this inspector might argue that my "Emergency disconnect, Not service equipment" might not allow the GEC to originate at this Disconnect. The disconnect is service rated, but only being used as an emergency disconnect.
There is no separate "ground" for the neutral to be in parallel with. Everything is bonded solely by and to the neutral.Emergency disconnect outside home, has ng bond
But another ng bond in service panel inside home that is issue cause by em disconnect
But it is250.6 is not relevant, any currents on the Utility side of the Service Equipment is not under the NEC.
I hate to sound rude but I don't know what you're saying. The Neutral can be bonded to Earth (ground) as many times as you want before the service equipment. In the service equipment you will install a Main Bonding Jumper, after that they will separate.But it is
See #24 #27 #31. On one hand ng bond in service panel in addition 'em disconnect not service equipment' ok because service conductors to service panel
On other hand feeder
conductors from' em disconnect, service disconnect ' to service panel violate, ng bond presence.
So by manipulating labelling only,
non complaint install made to code complaint install
Then after the switch you have a feeder.
Its a discussion about the mis-application of all of 230.85This discussion is about 230.85 condition 3
In addition there is still the requirement in 230.70(A)(1) often installers mistakenly think a "meter / main" labeled EM disconnect satisfies this section, thats why i call them 3-wire feeders.My Case it does - It simply matches the Main Breaker size for the service panel in the garage
My understanding is ED (not service equipment)
As soon as this conduit is no longer outside the structure per 230.6 230.70(A)(1) applies and a 'service disconnect' is required nearest the point of entrance if that 20' is meets 230.6 then its fine, but a EM disconnect cannot take the place of a service disconnect in that section.maybe 20' of conduit from outside to the main service panel.
Where did he state that?Its a discussion about the mis-application of all of 230.85
In order to use condition 230.85 (A)(3) A "meter main" as the OP stated he is using
Correct if the EM disconnect is also the service disconnect then the conductors after that are feeder conductors and the equipment where the feeder terminates cannot have the neutral bonded. Is that even applicable in this installation?On other hand feeder conductors from' em disconnect, service disconnect ' to service panel violate, ng bond presence
Correct, In my case there is a service rated disconnect used strictly as an emergency disconnect and it's right under a meter enclosure. There is no meter main or meter main combo in this case.Where did he state that?
It's not what he shows in post #61
No Meter main in the equation just a meter enclosure and disconnect inclosure with main breaker in it.In addition there is still the requirement in 230.70(A)(1) often installers mistakenly think a "meter / main" labeled EM disconnect satisfies this section, thats why i call them 3-wire feeders.
The OP states he has
As soon as this conduit is no longer outside the structure per 230.6 230.70(A)(1) applies and a 'service disconnect' is required nearest the point of entrance if that 20' is meets 230.6 then its fine, but a EM disconnect cannot take the place of a service disconnect in that section.
I don't have a meter main but it's interesting for you to point this out - All the meter mains I have seen are ONLY suitable for service equipment. I believe because you can only have a subpanel downstream (all these meter main combos are factory bonded N-G)Its a discussion about the mis-application of all of 230.85
In order to use condition 230.85 (A)(3) A "meter main" as the OP stated he is using has to have a marking that no manufacturer I am aware of offers:
"suitable for use as service equipment"
all "meter mains" I see at the supply house and big box stores are marked
"suitable ONLY for use as service equipment".
230.66 requires service equipment to be listed relabeling voids the listing.
The OP has a meter main:
In addition there is still the requirement in 230.70(A)(1) often installers mistakenly think a "meter / main" labeled EM disconnect satisfies this section, thats why i call them 3-wire feeders.
The OP states he has
The main Breaker service panel in the garage is fed by 3/0 L1/L2 and 2/0 N from the "Emergency Disconnect, Not service equipment". All conduit is PVC and the MBJ is in the garage panel. Everything metal upstream from the service panel; in this case the metal enclosure of the service disconnect and meter enclosure is bonded to Service Neutral via SSBJ. Well because that is the only way to bond upstream of the MBJ.B677
Please show any calculations your install complaint nec 250.6
overcome all objections
Not applicable in this application because label Emergency disconnect not service equipment only?Where did meter mains enter the equation in this installation?
Correct if the EM disconnect is also the service disconnect then the conductors after that are feeder conductors and the equipment where the feeder terminates cannot have the neutral bonded. Is that even applicable in this installation?