OK but the meaning of
No. see this:
So it electrical pool designer responsibility mitigate it. How they do it?
By equipotential. With that said, you either don't want to see it or can not see it but the discussion is not going anywhere at this point.
And you are wrong. The bonding grid is not an Equipment Ground in any way. It is specifically stated in the NEC that any connection to the pool equipment ground buss is not required.
Equipotential not fail-safe
I not say the bonding grid an equipment ground and your 'It is specifically stated in the NEC that any connection to the pool equipment ground buss is not required' correct because it already connected to egc in other ways
Neither is a circuit breaker or fuse. Nothing is. It's also why some jurisdictions require annual testing. The equi-potential bonding grid in a pool has nothing to do with clearing a fault. I realize you are not going to concede this point. I'm only responding to your posts to make it clear to anyone else who reads this thread that you are wrong and posting incorrect information.
I said equipotential fail-safe high ground fault current flowi aspect, not maintenance aspect.
The NEC is structured so that the first four chapters can be amended by chapters 5 through 8.
Yes chapters 5 through 8 can amend but not contradict 250.
Please elaborate on how this relates to the last sentence of 680.26 (B)
90.3 does not say that.
Do you know Sahib?
Last line imply use earth ground as return path but it prohibited in 250
India from?
Yes
Do you read the last sentence to exempt a pool grounding grid that say for example in your opinion is likely to become energized exemption from 250.4(A)(5)? I think falls short of that.
