1.5 or 2" emt / 41 # 10 thhn wires in a conduit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fulthrotl

~Autocorrect is My Worst Enema.~
I am installing 41 # 10 thhn wires in a conduit. 20am ckt. Using #10 because of derating. 50 % from 310-15b2. This is for a lighting dimmer. All ckts have there own neutral. I do not believe I need to count the neutrals. 310-b4. Am I right? Also Table C-1 says I can put 63 # 10's in a 2inch emt. Would you use 2" or bump it up to 2.5"? I have never installed this many wire in a conduit. and would like to know if the extra room would make life easier. Thanks.

neutrals count. sorry. :D

the only thing i see from a practical standpoint is that the pipe is totally
full for the derating level chosen, right? so... if there is one change to
the lighting (which is typical), you'll have to put the second conduit in
anyway.... i'm not gonna figure out which combination, cause i don't have
to pull it.... :D but maybe two 1 1/4" conduits, or something similar? so you
have a little wiggle room if ya have to add a pair.....

you'll have multiple pulls to get it in, unless you want to set up 41 spools, or
pull the stuff out first, then tape and figure 8 it, then untape it as you pull it
in.... :p sounds like fun....
 

scwirenut

Senior Member
why cant you set a gutter on top of the conduits and install neutral and ground bars, then bring up just one big neutral and EGC then all the individual neutrals/EGC's never leave the gutter. that also would cut down on heat because there would be very little actual current on the neutral
 

arnettda

Senior Member
why cant you set a gutter on top of the conduits and install neutral and ground bars, then bring up just one big neutral and EGC then all the individual neutrals/EGC's never leave the gutter. that also would cut down on heat because there would be very little actual current on the neutral
Individual neutrals is spec.
 

ohm

Senior Member
Location
Birmingham, AL
I find it hard to believe 40 circuits are all going from point "A" to point "B" and there couldn't be an advantage to running say 4 cc pairs in 3/4" C , in different directions, and protecting w/ 20A bkr.

Since the loads are dimmers (non-linear) I expect the wires are going to heat up and you would benefit from the conservative approach.
 

CopperTone

Senior Member
Location
MetroWest, MA
go with the bigger conduit even if the book says you don't need it - you know hard that pull will be to actually pull?
you will be wishing you did go with the bigger conduit half way through.
the wire rack will be a mess too
good luck
 

arnettda

Senior Member
I find it hard to believe 40 circuits are all going from point "A" to point "B" and there couldn't be an advantage to running say 4 cc pairs in 3/4" C , in different directions, and protecting w/ 20A bkr.

Since the loads are dimmers (non-linear) I expect the wires are going to heat up and you would benefit from the conservative approach.

There are 120 ckts total. I will not be running 40 ckts in one pipe anymore. It will be more like 10.
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
There are 120 ckts total. I will not be running 40 ckts in one pipe anymore. It will be more like 10.

10 CCC's (5 circuits) or an actual 10 circuits?

Is wireway an option? You can get 15 circuits (30 CCC's) in each run without derating. Additionally, without having to derate, you could use #12THHN.
120 ckts ? 15 ckts/run = 8 runs​
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Since these are not multi-receptacle circuits and 16 amps is not a standard size, 240.4(B) would permit the next standard size OCPD which is 20 amps.

Often dimmer racks do supply multi receptacle circuits and they often get loaded up.

Protecting 16 amp conductors at 20 amps is a bad design for this IMO.
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
Often dimmer racks do supply multi receptacle circuits and they often get loaded up.

Protecting 16 amp conductors at 20 amps is a bad design for this IMO.

That may or may not be true. In the theater project I'm currently involved with it's not true. But I agree that it's a poor design and would opt for more conduits with less CCC's. That was one of the reasons that I said that the conduit I would use would be 1" or 1.25".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top