Your original premise I responded to was simply conflating technically a 120V-only panel without a 14-50R without a neutral. To reference to any code sections or violations. When you lost that argument, you moved the goalposts - that’s was I found amusing. Who would wire up a pump and walk away not knowing it would function properly? I’m done.
I don’t know who would wire up a pump and walk away, you’re the one who is asking me to pull scenarios out of thin air. I did that to appease you so we could move on.
You said that I lost an argument, can you point that out? What argument was I having and where did I lose it? Who did I lose it too?
It seems like you completely misunderstood the entire discussion. When I said the results of wiring a panel for 120 V could be disastrous in some people’s opinion, I never said because it would provide voltage. I gave the example that it could be disastrous by
not providing voltage. For some reason you didn’t like this, and decided that you’re going to say that I lost the argument. But I was trying not to engage in that part of the argument since it has nothing to do with what I was speaking about. For the third time I will explain to you that making up scenarios based on your opinion of what is disastrous has nothing to do with this discussion. This discussion is about code.
If we have to follow the instructions of a receptacle that says it requires 120/240 V, don’t we also have to follow the instructions of a load center that also says it has to be 120/240 V?
If we have to follow the instructions of a receptacle that says you have to land a neutral on the neutral terminal, then don’t we also have to follow the instructions of a load center that says we have to install a different leg on each bus in order to ensure 240 V for the two pole breakers it tells us to install?
Please stop with the condescending smiles and the insulting words telling me that I lost an argument to you and how you’re leaving. Let’s just discuss code here, thank you