kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
1, I don't totally agree the problem will be worse, but if you have to much drop across a long run of conductor or too much impedance in the source (POCO transformer is marginally sized), or worse yet both, increasing your branch circuit size may not really gain anything for you.I am curious if we could expand on a couple of concepts -
- "Installing oversize conductors to only the loads that cause flicker without increasing the service conductors will only make the problem worse." How so?
- "... over sizing the branch circuit conductors to the HVAC would would allow more current on inrush and would flicker the lights more." The total impedance of the load is fixed while the voltage at the load is effectively higher, I don't see how load current goes up here relative to the smaller conductor.
"Since voltage drop is tied to the load you end up with over voltage during light loaded events if you boost your voltage for your full load, plus you still have the cost of all the associated gear to set a transformer. A size or two bigger wire is cheaper."
No perfect solution here and I didn't run the expense numbers, the boost concept is just a theoretical solution. You would certainly want to size the "boost" to only compensate for the voltage drop, not overcompensate. If you upsize the wire one or two sizes you still have voltage drop, just at a lower level. If you boost the voltage at the house, you might be able to restore full system voltage at the house (depending on a lot of variables, of course). I would clarify that a potential boost system be designed for no-load voltage at the house. It is quite correct to state that an overvoltage situation would be created if you design the system based on full load current.
2, some of the same applies here, if there is already significant voltage drop before we even get to branch circuit level, increasing branch circuit conductors may not really gain much.
There is both good and bad things happening at same time. Any reduction in impedance will allow more current to flow to the motor that is trying to start and help it start faster, but if the service or feeder is where the majority of voltage drop exists, it still draws voltage down on everything. This is exactly why with larger motors and industrial applications we sometimes must use reduced voltage starting methods, soft starters, etc. The motor being started can withstand this low voltage condition during starting, it is the problems it may create for other items sharing the same supply that is an issue, even if it is nothing more than the annoyance of dimming of lights to a occupant.
I once had a customer with a shop building that had sufficient sized service lateral conductors, but they connected to some overhead conductors that happened to span a couple additional poles before hitting the source. Maybe an additional 250-300 feet of overhead conductor. Transformer was right in front of this shop but across the street, our service was at the left rear of the building as you faced it. This shop was fine most of the time but every time their air compressor started it dimmed the lights pretty bad. I was able to talk the POCO in this case to put a transformer on the pole where the lateral conductors ended and now we can't even tell when the air compressor is starting if looking at the lights.