If anyone thinks they could get this line of reasoning past an AHJ or the CMP I will be shocked.
If you have to struggle to find a 'new way' to read it maybe you are reading it wrong.
I do not think that any AHJ would accept this, but I believe that that there is a small argument for mis-interpetation.
Do I agree that the code needs to be revised, NO, we all know what it it is supposed to mean.
Do I agree that it could be mis-interpeted, YES, there is validity to the ill use of grammer here.
Do I dis-agree that the revision is a bad thing, NO, we will still wire houses the same way we have always done.
This is just an exercise in English usage.