My interpretation of this is referring to table 250.122 first, so #10 is good all the way to 60 amps.
My interpretation of this is referring to table 250.122 first, so #10 is good all the way to 60 amps.
IMHO No.
The EGC must be increased in size proportional to the increase in size of the ungrounded conductors. So for a 30 amp breaker the EGC must be the same size as the ungrounded conductors.
Chris
if the ungrounded conductors were increased to reduce voltage drop do you still need to increase the EGC also?
if the ungrounded conductors were increased to reduce voltage drop do you still need to increase the EGC also?
If you increase the size of the ungrounded conductor for a reason as simple as 'its all I had on the truck' you would still have to comply.
But this would require rewiring the entire circuit then.
So we would need to get rid of the NM.
This is a question that came from another thread. Can a 30 amp breaker be on a #8 NM Wire and meet 250.122 (b)? # 8 NM cable has a #10 equipment ground wire
Now that I have fallen on my sword. What if I have this scenario and put the 30 amp breaker in to protect temporary equipment, and the final piece will be a need a 40 amp breaker and 8-2? Let's say it a Dryer change out. and the new dryer isn't here yet? Would this not satisfy 250.122(b)
Yes, until you decide to use a conductor size for the ungrounded conductor that is larger than is shown in the ampacity tables.doesn't the overcurrent protection determine the size of the EGC?
Now that I have fallen on my sword. What if I have this scenario and put the 30 amp breaker in to protect temporary equipment, and the final piece will be a need a 40 amp breaker and 8-2? Let's say it a Dryer change out. and the new dryer isn't here yet? Would this not satisfy 250.122(b)
doesn't the overcurrent protection determine the size of the EGC?
Yes, until you decide to use a conductor size for the ungrounded conductor that is larger than is shown in the ampacity tables.