I have heard that eventually it will be code that all switch boxes will have to have a neutral (grounded conductor) available, the reasoning is for occupancy sensor switches and other devices that control lights to save energy.
I would think that as these devices are brought out, at some time they would be required to be reverse compatible with older wiring systems, and as such would still have to be able to be used without a neutral at the switch location, I just think a standard that is compatible with both UL and the NEC should be implemented, such as the devices that use the power across the open switch to power the device, most have a little cap or battery that charges when the load is off, and keeps the device working while the load is on, thus not using the EGC for any current, there are many devices that use this system, but then again there are those that use the EGC for neutral return, I just don't think UL has required a standard to prevent this.
example of devices that use to load feed thru voltage is:
Lighted switches that light when switch is off
dimmers
some two wire photo cells
some event timers such as the Intermatic programmable switch box mount type.
and even some two wire motion detectors.
As for the OP, switch legs, or as some call them "dead end switches", have been used for years, and adding a unused neutral does nothing to prevent heuristic heating of the metal conduit of preventing a electric field around the circuit, as the switch leg itself does this, the neutral will not have any current on it so it would do nothing, the supply and return in the switch leg is all that is needed because it will cancel out any EMF effect, as they are 180? out of phase anyway, doesn't matter if its a 3-way or a single pole circuit. now running travelers between 3-ways or 3-ways and 4-ways can cause this if they are not run with the neutral feeding the load, or the return of the Switch leg feeding the light, but the NEC only cares about that if it is run in a ferrous metal raceway.