400 amp install

Status
Not open for further replies.
ceb58 said:
I agree this is something that needs looking at again. I was talking with an inspector the other day and he was of the understanding that it could still be used as feeders and rated in the 75c. indoors.

Nope we are in the '08 now so it must be used at 60C. However, by Jan.1, 2009 we should have a final ruling as to whether it will be reversed or not. Same is true for TR receptacles. We must use them now but possibly not after Jan.1, 2009. Very odd. We will see what happens.

BTW, for the others, this is a NC possible change
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Nope we are in the '08 now so it must be used at 60C.

Because it is basically the same as NM and when used as NM the rules should be the same. There is nothing special about SE that makes it better then NM when used in the same applications.

Read the ROPs. :)
 
iwire said:
Because it is basically the same as NM and when used as NM the rules should be the same. There is nothing special about SE that makes it better then NM when used in the same applications.

Read the ROPs. :)

I was making the distinction between inside & outside. Why is se allowed at 75C outside. Nm is not allowed outside and is rated 60C so there is a difference. Perhaps if nm were allowed on the exterior it could be rated 75C-- I don't know why.
 
Dennis Alwon said:
I was making the distinction between inside & outside. Why is se allowed at 75C outside. Nm is not allowed outside and is rated 60C so there is a difference. Perhaps if nm were allowed on the exterior it could be rated 75C-- I don't know why.

I suspect it is because SE run outside is rarely buried in thermal insulation like NM and SE run inside are.
 
Perhaps there should have been an exception where thermal insulation is not an issue. I have seen se cable sleeved into a crawl space with 2"pvc and an lb. In this case there is no thermal issue.
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Perhaps there should have been an exception where thermal insulation is not an issue. I have seen se cable sleeved into a crawl space with 2"pvc and an lb. In this case there is no thermal issue.

Seems needlessly complicated to me.

There are many things we used to do all the time but can not anymore. We used to be able to put a bunch of NMs through a hole without derating, we used to use whatever breaker fit, we used to use single pole breakers on NM.

Times change, pass the cost along to the customer and make more money.:)
 
iwire said:
Seems needlessly complicated to me.

There are many things we used to do all the time but can not anymore. We used to be able to put a bunch of NMs through a hole without derating, we used to use whatever breaker fit, we used to use single pole breakers on NM.

Times change, pass the cost along to the customer and make more money.:)

Bob, I have always respected and looked forward to you incite and through code knowledge but as you have stated in the past ( and correct me if I am wrong) but you work for a elect. contractor you are not a contractor. The statement of just pass the cost along to the customer is starting to weigh down the contractor in the market place. I have seen GC's tell the electrical contractors that they are not paying for all the new requirements. The contractors that have been in business for years walk away knowing the GC is going to get screwed (as they should) by a fly by night that is dumb enough to eat the cost increases. Some of the new code requirements I agree with such as the afci issue. I have seen and repaired suituations that only by the grace of God it did not start a fire. If the items were protected by the afci the situation would have been avoided. But, as has been discussed before, the manufactures are now pushing their products on to the NEC for nothing more than their bottom line. The se cable has been tested and proven over the years. What has now changed?
 
Brad Baxter said:
Ideas and inputs on a 400 amp service.

I am installing one of those GE 400 amp meter combo's with 2- 200 amp breakers in it. It's actually called a 320a continuos type combo. It was high at $1700.

You got ripped off.
You should take it back.
You can buy that panel for $400 with out the breakers . And with the breakers $700 max. total.
You got taken (ripped off) for a $1000.
I use these panels a lot.
 
Help

Help

buckofdurham said:
You got ripped off.
You should take it back.
You can buy that panel for $400 with out the breakers . And with the breakers $700 max. total.
You got taken (ripped off) for a $1000.
I use these panels a lot.


I have yet to pay for it. Please if you do these all the time can you tell me which brands you have? model, catalog# etc? Where can i get one?? The supplier is telling me that the ge version is between 1500-1900 and does not believe me when i say i heard it's in the 100's not thousands.
 
check out more than one supplier milbank makes a 400 comes with the extra 200 breaker and is between 600.00 - 650.00 max everywhere. you need to compare your pricing for all materials you buy from them if your being told that crazy price
 
Brad Baxter said:
I have yet to pay for it. Please if you do these all the time can you tell me which brands you have? model, catalog# etc? Where can i get one?? The supplier is telling me that the ge version is between 1500-1900 and does not believe me when i say i heard it's in the 100's not thousands.


Ite - Siemens
BR
I use siemens but I think A cutler Hammer BR makes them.
Sorry I don't have a catalog #. It is a very common item.
Don't pay $1700 for it. That's crazy.
They ussually come with out the breakers. You can get 125 or 150 amp breakers for the same panel. Say if you had a house that had a 200 amp panel at the house. And a detached garage you could put a 200 in the panel for the house and a smaller breaker for the garage. But mostly they are used like you are useing it for 2, 200 amp panels.

Supply houses have three or four prices one for real good customers then a couple for contractors. And they have a price for some one that walks in off the street. Do you know these guys very well ?

I should have asked where you are at. Your not on an Island some where are you?
 
NJ

NJ

buckofdurham said:
Ite - Siemens
BR
I use siemens but I think A cutler Hammer BR makes them.
Sorry I don't have a catalog #. It is a very common item.
Don't pay $1700 for it. That's crazy.
They ussually come with out the breakers. You can get 125 or 150 amp breakers for the same panel. Say if you had a house that had a 200 amp panel at the house. And a detached garage you could put a 200 in the panel for the house and a smaller breaker for the garage. But mostly they are used like you are useing it for 2, 200 amp panels.

Supply houses have three or four prices one for real good customers then a couple for contractors. And they have a price for some one that walks in off the street. Do you know these guys very well ?

I should have asked where you are at. Your not on an Island some where are you?

I'm in NJ but i need the combo that has the 2 200amp breakers in it. I cannot have 2 main panels on the inside because they are 25ft away from the meter.
 
Brad Baxter said:
I'm in NJ but i need the combo that has the 2 200amp breakers in it. I cannot have 2 main panels on the inside because they are 25ft away from the meter.


As long as your disconnects are outside you can put the main lug panels any where you want.
 
ceb58 said:
I agree this is something that needs looking at again. I was talking with an inspector the other day and he was of the understanding that it could still be used as feeders and rated in the 75c. indoors.
Here is an interesting scenario for those who use aluminum for se conductors and feeders.

400 amp meter base with 2- 200 amp panels. In the past we could run 4/0 aluminum to each panel and everyone would be happy. Then the CMP changed art. 310.15(B)(6) to clarify that in order to use T310.15(B)(6) the conductors must carry the full load of the service. So for a 200 amp service 4/0 SE cable is still good if it carries the full load of the service. Why? Because T310.15(B)(6) allows 4/0 aluminum for 200 amps and se cable is an acceptable wiring method.

Okay now back to the 400 amp service stated above. Se cable cannot even be used. Why because 4/0 seu to each panel will not satisfy Art. 310.15(B)(6).

Now we must use Table 310.16 which states we must use 300 KCM aluminum for 200 amps. 250 KCM is only good for 170 and 175 is next higher size breaker so you cannot use that conductor. 300 KCM is what must be used.

Let's install the seu cable from the 200 amp and use firecaulk around it into the building and that does not change a thing even though that is the main reason - as Bob pointed out- that SE cable has been derated to 60C.

So 200 amp service 4/0 se cable is fine for a SFD however 350 KCM must be used for a 400 amp service that utilizes 2-200 amp panels.
 
I get sq D 400amp. for 850.00 it comes with one 200 installed, extra 200 and lug kit. The sq D also has a 100 amp rated 8 space built in.
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Here is an interesting scenario for those who use aluminum for se conductors and feeders.

400 amp meter base with 2- 200 amp panels. In the past we could run 4/0 aluminum to each panel and everyone would be happy. Then the CMP changed art. 310.15(B)(6) to clarify that in order to use T310.15(B)(6) the conductors must carry the full load of the service. So for a 200 amp service 4/0 SE cable is still good if it carries the full load of the service. Why? Because T310.15(B)(6) allows 4/0 aluminum for 200 amps and se cable is an acceptable wiring method.

Okay now back to the 400 amp service stated above. Se cable cannot even be used. Why because 4/0 seu to each panel will not satisfy Art. 310.15(B)(6).

Now we must use Table 310.16 which states we must use 300 KCM aluminum for 200 amps. 250 KCM is only good for 170 and 175 is next higher size breaker so you cannot use that conductor. 300 KCM is what must be used.

Let's install the seu cable from the 200 amp and use firecaulk around it into the building and that does not change a thing even though that is the main reason - as Bob pointed out- that SE cable has been derated to 60C.

So 200 amp service 4/0 se cable is fine for a SFD however 350 KCM must be used for a 400 amp service that utilizes 2-200 amp panels.
would that still apply if you were to feed a separate structure with one 200 and the other 200 for the main structure
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top