If you go through the table published in the past though, and apply 83% factor and round up to next larger conductor if it doesn't hit a 310.15(16) value (in the 75C column) you mostly get same results that were published in the table, so I have to assume the table was originally based on 83%.
It appears to me the biggest change in '14 is that it made it clearer that the derating factors apply. NOW instead of using any 2/0 Cu for the applicable 200 amp service, you need a conductor rated at 166 amps with correction factors applied.
I hate to even think about it, but that seems to being the old SE cable at 60? back into play.
Last edited: