electrofelon
Senior Member
- Location
- Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
How do we know 240.21 overrides 310.12? I don't even see it as overriding really, 310.12 just changes the ampacity in some situations.Only that that would be weird and I've never seen such a thing. Pardon my lack of imagination.
Regardless, whatever unusual scenario you come up with, 240.21 just overrides 310.12.
Edit: I just reread Don's post number 21, honestly I'm not really seeing it. So his theory is if it said the "ampacity shall be" vs " Shall be permitted to have an ampacity....."? I don't really see a distinction and it seems to me in either case it's telling you what the ampacity is.