- Location
- Massachusetts
What document says that you can't have a cold water system and hot water system in a dwelling occupancy?
IMO the fact that they are mechanically and 'fluid' continuous makes a strong argument for one system.
What document says that you can't have a cold water system and hot water system in a dwelling occupancy?
IMO the fact that they are mechanically and 'fluid' continuous makes a strong argument for one system.
What document says that you can't have a cold water system and hot water system in a dwelling occupancy? I see them as two water piping systems. I also do not see the gray water system and the waste water system as being covered by the rule in 250.104(A). I see those system being covered by the rule in 250.104(B).
From the Plumbing Code.
Chapter 2
BUILDING SERVICES PIPING. All piping systems and their component parts that are part of a building system and that promote the safe, sanitary, and energy efficient occupancy of a building. Building services piping includes, but is not limited to, cold and hot potable water distribution for plumbing fixtures;
Everyone knows my feelings so I will sit back and let you decide on your own.
Thank you for posting the plumbing code that clearly states that the cold and hot water distribution is part of the same POTABLE water system. The rest of your post clearly states what other water systems are.
The NEC makes the statement that water system(s) will be bonded and it does not have a laundry list for these system(s)
Edited out the rest for clarity
Old habits are hard to break.
Let me try this another way.
I am the EC and you are the EI. I finish all my work in a home and call you for a final. You show up and see that the plumber has all kind of copper plumbing ran but with no hot water tank nor fixtures of any kind. What if anything do you want bonded? It is not a complete system and I don't bond. Do you pass me? Fail me? Come back later and verify continuity of the plumbing lines?
Does anyone else agree that this is a poorly written code section that needs to be reviewed?
You are correct the NEC does not say potable water but again you are correct it does say system.Yes. And if the NEC said POTABLE water you would be correct but it does not.
(A) Metal Water Piping. The metal water piping system
shall be bonded as required ........
Water distribution pipe. A pipe within the structure or on the premises that conveys water from the water service pipe, or from the meter when the meter is at the structure, to the points of utilization
NOT
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM. The water service pipe, water distribution pipes, and the necessary connecting pipes, fittings, control valves and all appurtenances in or adjacent to the structure or premises.
(1) General. Metal water piping system(s) installed in or
attached
I also see nothing that says complete or sections or anything but system.
Using your logic, if metal water entry, I could ground within 5', before the meter, filters , softeners or anything else, and be done. It is a bond to a "complete" system.
250.104(B) applies to non-water piping. It is either water (A) or it is not (B).
Ever seen one of these? Know what it does?
View attachment 7230
Ever seen theses?
View attachment 7231
It is my expert, plumbing, opinion that the systems are seperate.
As a serious concern no argument intended. In the code I don't see the term complete water system. If it is a significant run of copper piping that carries water, wouldn't that be a part of a water system that is metal, and hence a "metal water system"?
Second, especially if their intent was as you stated, you could have PVC in the ground, 10 feet of copper at the entrance, dielectric fittings, or PVC piping in between and then 80% of the rest of the hot and cold systems could be in copper. Where is there any sense in bringing a 250-66 sized ground to the 10 foot section at the entrance, and where does it tell you that you should or should not bring this to the more significant part of the system that is metal?
I am truly confused. IMO, given today's construction standards, new construction should dictate all metal piping should fall under section (B)
I sign off and walk away. The plumbing is outside the scope of the electrical inspector.Let me try this another way.
I am the EC and you are the EI. I finish all my work in a home and call you for a final. You show up and see that the plumber has all kind of copper plumbing ran but with no hot water tank nor fixtures of any kind. What if anything do you want bonded? It is not a complete system and I don't bond. Do you pass me? Fail me? Come back later and verify continuity of the plumbing lines?
5-236 Log #2432 NEC-P05 Final Action: Reject
(250.104(A)(1))
__________________________________________________ __________
Submitter: Robert P. McGann, City of Cambridge
Recommendation: Revise text to read as follows:
Metal water piping system(s) that is likely to be energized , installed in or attached to a building or structure shall be bonded.
Substantiation: With much expanded use of plastic water piping system(s) isolating section of metal piping systems. This type of installation leaves contractors and inspectors what is required to be bonded.
Panel Meeting Action: Reject
Panel Statement: The requirements of 250.104(A) apply to complete metallic water piping systems. Where there is no complete metallic water piping system, then the requirements of 250.104(B) would apply for those portions of isolated metal water piping system likely to become energized.
Number Eligible to Vote: 15
Ballot Results: Affirmative: 15
You are correct the NEC does not say potable water but again you are correct it does say system.
What constitutes a system? If we look at the definition of an electrical system in the NEC includes the complete system such as the premises wiring system and grounding electrode system. The plumbing code even calls the hot and cold parts of the potable water system as you posted above.
The plumbing code also recognizes the difference between different water systems such as potable, gray, and waste. What some try to do is to split the systems into two systems such as cold and hot when the fact remains the same, the hot and cold are part of the same potable water system just as the 120 and 240 is part of the same system on my home.
If you had a metal water system that had filters, softeners and the like then the connection within the first five feet fulfills the requirement of 250.52(A)(1) but you would still be required to install the requirement of 250.104(A) unless there was nothing in line in which case the conductor within the first five feet would be all that was required.
It is not my opinion it is the Code Making Panel?s opinion and it is posted a couple of pages back. If it is not a complete metal piping system then bond using 250.104(B). If one of those fittings were installed then 250.104(B) applies.
5-236 Log #2432 NEC-P05 Final Action: Reject
(250.104(A)(1))
__________________________________________________ __________
Submitter: Robert P. McGann, City of Cambridge
Recommendation: Revise text to read as follows:
Metal water piping system(s) that is likely to be energized , installed in or attached to a building or structure shall be bonded.
Substantiation: With much expanded use of plastic water piping system(s) isolating section of metal piping systems. This type of installation leaves contractors and inspectors what is required to be bonded.
Panel Meeting Action: Reject
Panel Statement: The requirements of 250.104(A) apply to complete metallic water piping systems. Where there is no complete metallic water piping system, then the requirements of 250.104(B) would apply for those portions of isolated metal water piping system likely to become energized.
Number Eligible to Vote: 15
Ballot Results: Affirmative: 15
See the proposal above
I sign off and walk away. The plumbing is outside the scope of the electrical inspector.
The opinion is wrong and it is not in the NEC.
Bonding/grounding not an inspector problem?
It is exactly what is written in the NEC. 250.104(A) requires that the system be bonded and that is all that is required.
There is not one word of verbiage that would lead me to believe that the metal water pipe is to be made electrically continuous. As a matter of fact that is something outside the scope of the electrical code. Electricians don?t install plumbing and electrical inspectors don?t inspect plumbing. The plumbing code will allow a metal pipe to be repaired using a nonmetallic pipe. Is the plumber supposed to then hire an electrician to bond around this repair?
Then there is the idea that there are two different potable water systems in a building. Some think that there is a potable cold water system and then there is a potable hot water system when the fact of the matter is they are both part of the same system. The same potable water flows through all these pipes.
Then you ask me about an incomplete plumbing system and how I would handle it as an electrical inspector. If when I arrive the plumber has never been on the job at all and I was there for a final I would inspect what was present in front of me, sign off and go home. What I wouldn?t do is start assuming something might happen. The plumbing is incomplete so therefore it is not a complete metal water system while I am there.
If all this isn?t bad enough we start with what might be happening down the street. If this was the purpose of the bonding pray tell me why this bonding is not required to be done on the supply side of the water meter or shut off valve where it would do some good instead of somewhere on the interior metal pipe?
Ok, if I would agree that there is only one potable water system (something that will never happen), and both of these systems have an equal amount of pipe, which one, if any requires a 250.104(A) bond?
Yes there are a few different type of water systems such as but not limited to, potable, gray, and wasteYour job as an electrician is to bond the water piping systems. Let me say that again. SYSTEMS with a big S.
YesHave you ever performed work that has been inspected under the plumbing code? I have.
YesHave you ever inspected others work using the plumbing code? I have.
dittoYour opinion as an electrician or inspector (and I am both) means nothing as how to define plumbing systems.
See 300.4 of the NEC for more information on thisI supposed that you think it is OK to drill holes 1 1/4" from the bottom of a joist. That is the building inspectors job to inspect that hole not the EI.
It is no longer in the NEC therefore not enforceable by an electrical inspector. Just what do you think is trying to be accomplished by bonding across something that breaks the metal water system? Is this not what is trying to be accomplished by bonding across a water heater? If it is not then why do it?You keep interjecting words like "electrically continuous". Where is that in the code? Who brought that up?
I don?t understand this statement therefore I cannot elaborate on its meaning.As Don said in another post, my words not his "not there when I installed it".
Just what are we discussing here? Is it not the potable water that is being discussed? I wasn?t aware that we were discussing a water heater for the waste water system. It is the Code Making Panel that governs this code section that uses the word ?complete?. Are you saying that they are wrong in making such a statement?Why are you hung up on potable? Where is complete?
This is the basis of my post, a metal water piping system which would include the ?complete? potable water. It is others who are trying to split this metal water piping into two separate systems.The words are simple. Metal water piping!
Then pray tell me why an electrical inspector would try and enforce it?This is the first thing we agree upon! "As a matter of fact that is something outside the scope of the electrical code"