Re: alterations and integrity
Oh my what a hack job, clearly voiding the UL listing of the panelboard. I would also venture a guess that it violates panelboard construction standards for panels with regard to enclosure space requirements for bending of conductors (408.3 directed to 312.6)and other things (see 408.55 and 408.56). Just envision how oversized a split main bus panelboard enclosure is compared to a standard one! This would also compromise bus bracing for fault current that the panel is designed to withstand.
I live in the northeast and after a major ice storm 2 years ago that knocked out power to most of CT for days many people bought into residential generator units. My brother purchased a generator residential "kit" that included an ATS/Sub-panel assembly and wiring harnesses for line and load connections. They required the installer to provide the necessary 2 pole subfeed c/b and install it in the existing panel and connect the provided wiring harnesses from the subfeed c/b to the line side of the switch, and from the load side of the sub-panel branch c/b's back to the existing branch circuits in the existing panelboard. The only thing I didn't like about it was that it required you to connect the branch circuits being fed from the emergency sub panel through the enclosure of the existing panel, a potential violation of 312.8 if additional wiring were to be installed from the c/b's that were freed up by swapping circuits over to the sub-panel. I guess the "kit" obtained approval under the premise that if fill was not violated before the install, it wouldn't be violated after the install either. It just opens things up for a potential violation should circuits be added in the future to the existing panel. All in all it was a clean installation, and very easy. The kit featured a Generac unit.
[ March 10, 2005, 04:37 PM: Message edited by: marketman ]