ultramegabob
Senior Member
- Location
- Indiana
I think it would be much safer for the electrician to drink bottled beer when working, especially if he is storing his empties inside the equipment....
quogueelectric said:You are just lying awake hoping Bret Favre will sign with you who are you kidding??????
iwire said:How about a more realistic example? :smile:
NEC said:Approved. Acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
resistance said:I still stand on my last.
"Why don't we just alter the panel cover,and build our own Interlock kit....."
volt102 said:What! You have never seen that?![]()
I buy a large pvc can that is listed. Install 10 motor starters with heaters that are listed, a control transformer listed of course, 4 vfd's also listed, with 8 lighted push buttons in the face (as you might have guessed- also listed).
How does one know that all these listed parts play nice together? What about the heating effects of the transformer, will it effect the overload functions? What if I drill holes to let the heat out? Will the arcing of the contactors have an effect on the insulation of the factory's insulated windings of that transformer?
Also, if there is anything that raises red flags while inspecting, such as drilling excessive holes in a disconnect, if I have the slightest indication that the modifications would add to the deterioration of the equipment, structural integrity, or subject someone who uses it to an arc blast, I would ask for it to be subject to re-evalution.
M. D. said:Yeah ,,,not only that Bob,.. they like to weld LB fittings closed,... paranoid buggers:grin:
iwire said:Lets say you do.
Show me a code section that prohibits doing that.
iwire said:Yes that is true, which as Charlie said
quogueelectric said:I am saying you cannot alter a product without taking on liability.
volt102 said:What triggers a third party inspection in Taxachussetts?
(can you believe that spellchecker actually assisted me with that)
iwire said:The NEC would allow that as well if the AHJ agrees.![]()
The NEC only requires that interlock equipment to be approved for the intended use. 702.4 / 702.6
Ask yourself why the NFPA chose the words 'approved' and 'suitable' vs 'listed' in those two sections.![]()
iwire said:I am not sure as a resident I should laugh or cry about that. :grin:
They have the highest unemployment payout for the country 600 per week plus 25 bucks a kid I think. Thanks Teddy. NY is only 405 and no kid bonus.iwire said:I think a modification to the current carrying components of a disconnect would, or swapping new guts into an existing switch.
In other words major changes, not just lock being installed. :smile:
LOL
I am not sure as a resident I should laugh or cry about that. :grin:
M. D. said:For informational purposes ,..not related to disconnect question,..sorry
Mass 4th,.....N.H. 9th ..... FWIW
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/336.html
Taxachussetts
and a lot of disconnect switches are not rated for opening at full load. read the stickers that come on them.iwire said:LOL yeah kind of like that. :grin:
But again the disconnect is there for the servicing the equipment, it is not there as a means of emergency stop.