EBFD6 said:
blatantly obvious). Just because the officer being interviewed cannot pinpoint the exact point of origin at the second he is being interviewed, doesn't mean it wasn't electrical in nature.
That being said, determining the cause of a fire is extremely difficult and requires years of specialized training. Usually the quotes that you read in the paper or see on the news are from regular firefighters or fire officers and not from the fire investigators who are the ones that actually determine causation. As such you should not read too much into the "guess" that you hear quoted as it is usually not the wording that appears on the official report of the Fire Marshal's office.
Quote from the Article:
"?It was some sort of short-circuit,? Capt. Kelenosy said of the cause oif the fire, ?but they can?t pinpoint it at this time.?"
Some sort of short-circuit, but they cannot pinpoint it at this time - give me a break, how unprofessional is that.
They just finished with the fire and know it is electrical, but cannot remember exactly where it started...in a SMALL cottage type house.
SORRY, I do not buy that. Pinpointing a fire's cause is not something to be forgotten so quickly.
I have seen WAY too many fire chiefs who think they are cause and origin experts...they are not. They may be great at fighting fires and I will give them that, not as cause and origin guys though.
We have not said there are fires that are electrical in nature. We do know that the fire departments in general will pin a fire on electrical especially if there is pressure being put on them to know.
I say that all fires should have a mandatory 2 day grace period as a law before the source of the fire is divulged to the public. This way there will not be so much pressure on the small fire departments and it will provide time for the professional Cause and Origin people to determine the actual cause.