Yep. About as close to an admission of guilt you might get even if just tacit.Well, when the POCO pushes an emergency ticket and replaces the triplex, I'm going to hazard a guess there's a strong case here.
Yep. About as close to an admission of guilt you might get even if just tacit.Well, when the POCO pushes an emergency ticket and replaces the triplex, I'm going to hazard a guess there's a strong case here.
Nonsense. There is no guilt about equipment made by someone else failing. The POCO is an end user of that equipment.Yep. About as close to an admission of guilt you might get even if just tacit.
Was it an equipment failure? Who made the connection that became loose?Nonsense. There is no guilt about equipment made by someone else failing. The POCO is an end user of that equipment.
It failed. They replaced it, quckly even. That shows due diligence, not guilt.
Who made the connector?Was it an equipment failure? Who made the connection that became loose?
Was the connector faulty?Who made the connector?
But maybe worth filing a written complaint? What's to lose?Locally they would come out and replace the triplex amnd say "we didn't find anything wrong but we went ahead and replaced it since we were here" Well trained, they are
Might have been "act of God" that made it come loose.Was it an equipment failure? Who made the connection that became loose?
A good example of where a utilty would normally accept responsibility. I've seen that, lines dropped on cars, wrong transformer voltage, etc. where they would normally pay for damage because it was clearly their fault.POCO typically needs to be proven negligent to get any claim from them.
I once had a large cattle feed yard that they had a three phase open delta service at one end of the place. It supplied a shop building, and mostly (at that time) 175 watt mercury vapor lights throughout the yard, and tank heaters for livestock watering tanks. About only three phase load was limited items in the shop and a three phase submersible well. this service had underground MV cable (POCO's lines), was originally constructed with three lines but later changed to open delta as the utilization method. It was getting age and occasionally a MV cable would fail. POCO simply would swap to the spare lead and repair the fault when it was convenient for them.
One time they did the swap after a failure, guys checked the rotation when done but neglected to ensure the high leg was in the proper position
I was paid by the POCO with no questions asked to make repairs all over that place - they knew it was their fault.
POCO's responsibility to fix. Rapid repair is no indication of liability for the failure.Was the connector faulty?
Who rapidly fixed the problem?
Who's responsibility was it to fix the problem if not the POCO?
Time.But maybe worth filing a written complaint? What's to lose?
I thought discussion about religion(s) was out of bounds here?Might have been "act of God" that made it come loose.
You going for the mid-year ban?I thought discussion about religion(s) was out of bounds here?
I am not discussing that topic on here.You going for the mid-year ban?
I am not discussing that topic on here.
Kwired wasn't bringing up anything religious, "act of God" is a standard term in many insurance policies and legal disclaimers here.
Define adequate. Prove that squirrels, or subsequent wind, weak insulation, etc. did not cause the failure.