You're welcome to your opinion as well. That's a nice sentiment but that's not reality. Risks is calculated all the time. Probability vs impact. You don't have to agree that's a fact. There are many things that can be done differently that statistically may prevent one death but are not done because of the trade off. I am not advocating recklessness or saying money is more important. I am saying everything could be safer, but there is an appropriate level of safety where additional measures become more burdensome compared to the potential benefit. Otherwise every driver and passenger in America should wear a 5 point harness, a helmet, Hans device, and a fire suite. Additionally every public roadway should have soft walls instead of concrete barriers, and cars should not have the ability to go more than 65MPH. Cars should have full roll cages, and escape hatches like race cars. Why cars are manufactured with the capability of 100 MPH when no roads allow it is yet another way to prevent a death. Those changes would prevent many deaths why are they not implemented? Obviously I don't advocate that because the risk is not worth the added cost and inconvenience, but it would save at least one life and you said that's too many. That's just a sentimental line and not reality.
