bath tub light

Status
Not open for further replies.
Inspectorcliff said:
According to what I read in the 2005 N.E.C. Article 410.4 is if you maintain the distance 3ft horizontally and 8ft above the top of the tub rim Yes, you can install a sconce on the wall.
:)

Actually 410.4(D) is only dealing with cord-connected luminaire, chain-, cable, or cord suspended-luminaires, lighting track, pendants, or ceiling suspended paddle fans. If you have a surface mounted wall sconce that is rated for the location it could go anywhere in the tub area. Take a look at 410.4(A)

Chris
 
Cliff--I don't see that. Where are you getting that from. 410.4 (D) makes no mention of wall sconce but it does mention pendants etc.

I believe you can mount the light over the tub on the wall.
 
yep

yep

raider1 said:
Actually 410.4(D) is only dealing with cord-connected luminaire, chain-, cable, or cord suspended-luminaires, lighting track, pendants, or ceiling suspended paddle fans. If you have a surface mounted wall sconce that is rated for the location it could go anywhere in the tub area. Take a look at 410.4(A)

Chris
Chris, you are absolutely correct, Thanks.:smile:
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Cliff--I don't see that. Where are you getting that from. 410.4 (D) makes no mention of wall sconce but it does mention pendants etc.

I believe you can mount the light over the tub on the wall.
I am humbled, you are both correct.:grin:
 
Inspectorcliff said:
According to what I read in the 2005 N.E.C. Article 410.4 is if you maintain the distance 3ft horizontally and 8ft above the top of the tub rim Yes, you can install a sconce on the wall.
:)


A wall sconce is permitted within the tub zone just like a recessed light fixture is. It will have to be damp or wet rated based on the location.
 
raider1 said:
If you have a surface mounted wall sconce that is rated for the location it could go anywhere in the tub area.
Chris

Thanks for the support-- BTW-- I am not sure that the fixture over a tub would even be considered damp location. If it were than the entire bathroom would be considered damp location.

IMO-- an open sconce is permitted (although I don't like it) over the tub also.

Cliff- we are all humbled all the time around here.
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Thanks for the support-- BTW-- I am not sure that the fixture over a tub would even be considered damp location. If it were than the entire bathroom would be considered damp location.

IMO-- an open sconce is permitted (although I don't like it) over the tub also.

Cliff- we are all humbled all the time around here.

You are welcome.

I agree that a recessed can over a tub would probably not be considered a damp location.

Chris
 
stickboy1375 said:
Dennis, is an open sconce any different than a flood holder stuck in the ground lighting a sign?

The difference is that the floodlight fixture is wet location. I am saying this sconce does not need to be damp or wet location rated. Open wall sconce 4' over the tub-- no problem.
 
Dennis Alwon said:
The difference is that the floodlight fixture is wet location. I am saying this sconce does not need to be damp or wet location rated. Open wall sconce 4' over the tub-- no problem.


Any fixture within 3' and in the tub zone needs to be damp rated.
 
infinity said:
Any fixture within 3' and in the tub zone needs to be damp rated.

You are correct.

This is going to change in the 2008 NEC, too luminaires in the actual outside tub or shower dimensions to a height of 8 feet will need to be damp rated or wet rated if subject to shower spray.

Chris
 
bath tub light

Dennis Alwon said:
Cliff--I don't see that. Where are you getting that from. 410.4 (D) makes no mention of wall sconce but it does mention pendants etc.

I believe you can mount the light over the tub on the wall.

What is the difference between an open wall sconce or an open cieling fixture if they both fall within the "zone " refernced above?
Does every possibility have to be listed for us to follow it as part of the requirement or restriction of a section?
I was told as an electrician that we were the cream of the crop.
As an inspector I still believe that [in most cases].
It seems the intent here is clear and semantics will not change that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top