quogueelectric
Senior Member
- Location
- new york
While he has the book open also hit SINGLE PHASE XFORMER it is inherently single phase by definitionRick Christopherson said:Please, oh wise and infallible one, enlighten me in my erroneous ways.
While he has the book open also hit SINGLE PHASE XFORMER it is inherently single phase by definitionRick Christopherson said:Please, oh wise and infallible one, enlighten me in my erroneous ways.
Rick Christopherson said:Please, oh wise and infallible one, enlighten me in my erroneous ways.
quogueelectric said:While he has the book open also hit SINGLE PHASE XFORMER it is inherently single phase by definition
I alluded to this in another thread, but I did not go so far as to directly challenge what you list in your user profile, and I am not being sarcastic.rattus said:Real engineers are not sarcastic either.
So rattus -rattus said:... Real engineers are not sarcastic either.
Keep trying then This post is titled the battle of the phases. Do you remember back in Reel engineering school the transformer drawing that looked like a christmas tree?? A four wire delta?? A 120/240 delta with a high leg?? page 13 in the uglys book?? Does any of this sound familiar?? Did your airbag deploy recently?? Like you would find at say a gas station which has mostly 3phase pump loads but needs some 120/240 for the lights and recepicles??rattus said:What does this discussion have to do with two-phase, three-phase, poly-phase, multi-phase, or the phase of the moon for that matter??
Real engineers know the difference between two-phase and phase difference. Sorry quogue, the Devil made me say it.
This must be the 99th time I have tried to get this point across.
mivey said:It is simply a fact that V1 and V2 are 180 degrees out of phase.
Rick Christopherson said:I alluded to this in another thread, but I did not go so far as to directly challenge what you list in your user profile, and I am not being sarcastic.
I am now asking this as a direct question:
Did you, or did you not, graduate from an ABET Accredited University Program with a Bachelor of Science (or higher) degree in Electrical Engineering?
If you do not know if your University program was ABET accredited, then list the name of the University and the Program, and I will tell you if it is accredited or not.
quogueelectric said:Keep trying then This post is titled the battle of the phases. Do you remember back in Reel engineering school the transformer drawing that looked like a christmas tree?? A four wire delta?? A 120/240 delta with a high leg?? page 13 in the uglys book?? Does any of this sound familiar?? Did your airbag deploy recently?? Like you would find at say a gas station which has mostly 3phase pump loads but needs some 120/240 for the lights and recepicles??
jim dungar said:Boy it is hard not to jump back in to this.
V1 and V2 are not out of phase with each other. They can not be because they are simply two points for one measurement. If I remember geometry correctly, two points make a single straight line, it is not possible to have an angle between them.
If you want to add an arbitrary third point for reference (i.e. a neutral in a 120/240 3 wire system, or dirt, or your neighbors car battery) then you may begin to discuss angles, phases, directions, or any number of other topics. But, when making your argument remember not every circuit/system may have your reference point.
rattus said:V1 and V2 cannot be measured without some reference point.
jim dungar said:That is why my point was directed to a specific statement that said two points were out of phase without specifing that a third reference point was involved. Participants in discussions need to use a common terminology and not assume that any specific reference point is "always understood". Voltages reading should always be given in a "from and to" format.
I spend more time working with 240V corner grounded, 240V ungrounded, and 240/120V wild leg systems than I do 120/240 single phase. I have hard time problem solving when all I am given is V1 = 240V, V2 = 240V as I am left to guess what reference was being used.
don_resqcapt19 said:We have been down this road before, but if the two conductors are out of phase with each other we cannot possibly have a single phase system. A phase cannot be out of phase with itself. There are only two choices....agree that they are not out of phase, or agree that they are and get rid of the term single phase. The two ideas are mutually exclusive.
dbuckley said:That thing where you have 120-0-120 supply, the first item in the diagram; it is without doubt a single phase system (hint - count the wires on the primary of the transformer of a typical single phase supply).
There seems to be some confusion between the terms "polarity" and "phase". For the avoidence of doubt, you have a to have a time difference between the zero cross points of the waveforms to have a phase difference between the waveforms. In a single phase system there is no time difference between the two "ends" of the supply, though they differ in polarity compared to the centre point.
Even though I am a newbie to this forum, and I know I risk being banned from the forum for this, but I did not ask this question in a disrespectful way. I think we all have the right to know the basis behind a person's comments.rattus said:I don't think that is a matter for this Forum. It is not your place to ask such a question. You are being condescending again.