But if it was my house, I would want it replaced. No way I would stand for a bunch of taped up conductors.Simple enough repair if every box does not require work.
No fix, no pay.
300.4 Protection Against Physical Damage. Where subject to physical damage, conductors, raceways, and cables shall be protected.
Splices and junctions need to be made with products 'listed and rated for the use intended', so the repair would need to be with a product listed for insulation repair.300.14 Length of Free Conductors at Outlets, Junctions, and Switch Points. At least 150 mm (6 in.) of free conductor, measured from the point in the box where it emerges from its raceway or cable sheath, shall be left at each outlet, junction , and switch point for splices or the connection of luminaires or devices. The 150 mm (6 in.) free conductor shall be permitted to be spliced or un-spliced. Where the opening to an outlet, junction, or switch point is less than 200 mm (8 in.) in any dimension, each conductor shall be long enough to extend at least 75mm (3 in.) outside the opening. Exception: Conductors that are not spliced or terminated at the outlet, junction, or switch point shall not be required to comply with 300.14.
Well, it wouldn't work very well if it wasn't.. . . tape is tacky . . .
Agreed; as I said earlier, why cut and splice an intact conductor?It seems that cutting that connection and using a wire-nut or lever-nut would be a 'compliant' repair, though clearly worse in nearly every way than just wrapping with tape.
Send them the pictures you posted here and invite them to to this conversationHad a few minutes to stop by the house today. Noticed this posted...
Guess I'll either have to argue with my builder that I won't accept the work or I'll just have to go back myself and fix all of it. Apparently not a concern to the electrical inspectors here.
I'll continue to bug the inspections office and see if I can actually talk to one of their inspectors. I left a message yesterday in hopes I could meet with them when they went to the house but never heard back...
View attachment 2564380
For the moment, until box gets reworked down the road. Then you may have fireworks.110.7 Wiring Integrity. Completed wiring installations shall be
free from short circuits, ground faults, or any connections to
ground other than as required or permitted elsewhere in this
Code.
Problem with that is, even with the missing insulation, it is free from shorts, ground faults or any other connection to ground.
JAP>
Its kinda odd there doesn't seem to be a specific code violation.
Sorry synchro - I see you did cite it. The question then becomes: Is it enforceable?I’m surprised no one has cited Section 110.12. It may seem to be a bit ambiguous but the IN references a very specific standard.
Yes it is unfortunate we need codes for such common Sense things, but we clearly do.Why should there be? It's just common sense that when a cable or conductor is damaged it needs to be repaired or replaced. Certainly when you see copper exposed there is damage.
-Hal
In my opinion, unless you are really adept at using a razor knife to draw across the sheathing without penetrating the conductors, don't do it. Draw the tip of the utility blade down the length a ways, the bare ground wire is in the middle of the cable so keep the cut down the centerline of the cable. Of course if you "run off course" and push too hard you may cut into one of the circuit conductors, however it's usually easier to notice it because it's not inconspicuously right where the wire enters the box.Is this a code violation or just considered sloppy electrical work? Anything specific in the NEC or NFPA?
Had a few minutes to stop by the house today. Noticed this posted...
Guess I'll either have to argue with my builder that I won't accept the work or I'll just have to go back myself and fix all of it. Apparently not a concern to the electrical inspectors here.
I'll continue to bug the inspections office and see if I can actually talk to one of their inspectors. I left a message yesterday in hopes I could meet with them when they went to the house but never heard back...
View attachment 2564380
No, look again.This shows to be the Plumbing Inspection, not the Electrical.
JAP>
BLDG.□ELECT.■PLUMBING□...This shows to be the Plumbing Inspection, not the Electrical.
JAP>