brantmacga
Señor Member
- Location
- Georgia
- Occupation
- Former Child
We completed a service upgrade today on a reception hall. Most of the circuits were not labeled, and in the course of identifying circuits, we found the fountain pump was fed from this service (property has multiple services).
Upon inspection of the fountain wiring I found this .....
We did not re-connect this circuit.
What you see is UF coming through the shell into a metallic LB, then EMT along the wall to a PVC junction box. The water level has leaked down to the hole the UF is coming through.
I’ve been reading through 680 for an answer on this.
My thoughts right now are to pull up some pavers to get the UF out and install it into a deck box. I think then we could run GRC out of this box back into the shell and thread on an underwater junction box (also patching the hole around the conduit). The pump cord would then go into the underwater junction box.
The deck box would be non-metallic; bonding bushing on the GRC.
Anything about this seem out of compliance?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Upon inspection of the fountain wiring I found this .....
We did not re-connect this circuit.
What you see is UF coming through the shell into a metallic LB, then EMT along the wall to a PVC junction box. The water level has leaked down to the hole the UF is coming through.
I’ve been reading through 680 for an answer on this.
My thoughts right now are to pull up some pavers to get the UF out and install it into a deck box. I think then we could run GRC out of this box back into the shell and thread on an underwater junction box (also patching the hole around the conduit). The pump cord would then go into the underwater junction box.
The deck box would be non-metallic; bonding bushing on the GRC.
Anything about this seem out of compliance?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
