An employee says he got shocked, just like we all get shocked at times. Nothing out of the ordinary. There were no holes blown in him, no burns, etc. Well he moves on to another job, completes that job, then goes out to my house to pick up a part. He gets to my house approximately 2 hours after this shock. He says he pulled up at my house and was feeling light headed, started walking over to where the parts are and the next thing he remembers is waking up in an ambulance.
At the hospital all of the tests they did came back normal.
This morning I talked to his girlfriend and according to her the doctors are saying it was a delayed reaction to the shock. Well how can the doctors know it's a delayed reaction to a shock when all of the tests came back normal? (If the doctors even said that.)
Anyone ever heard of anything like this? Even if it is a delayed reaction to a shock, how would the doctors know this definitely? (Especially from my understanding all of the tests they have done have come back normal.)
Process of elimination? So all of the tests are normal and he tells him he got shocked a couple of hours ago so automatically the shock is what caused him losing consciousness 2 hours later? Why couldn't it have been a candy bar he ate on the way to my house? Or why couldn't it have been some sort of reaction he may have come in contact with between the job and my house? Or why couldn't it be he simply laid in the yard until he was found?
I know something happened to him. Seizure, diabetic problems maybe, etc... I just have never heard of being shocked (and he told the customer at the house it didn't get him when he bumped 2 wires together) and 2 hours later losing consciousness.
Just trying to understand it.
Any insight is appreciated.
first insight: making statements like this one is a poor choice for an employer.
"An employee says he got shocked, just like we all get shocked at times. Nothing out of the ordinary."
statements like this tend to have a bad effect on your liability if someone suffers a serious injury.
seriously, what kind of chrome plated bullshit is this?
second insight:
"So all of the tests are normal and he tells him he got shocked a couple of hours ago so
automatically the shock is what caused him losing consciousness 2 hours later?"
yes, but not automatically, as in a default response. a heart attack several hours later
has been known to happen. so laying down on the front lawn is better than having a
heart attack fifteen minutes later, driving on the freeway.
third insight:
"Why couldn't it have been a candy bar he ate on the way to my house?"
i'm sixty years old, i've been eating candy bars all my life, and i've never found
the need to pass out on the front lawn from a snickers. Tequila, yes. Snickers, no.
Or why couldn't it have been some sort of reaction he may have come in contact
with between the job and my house?
with what? an allergic reaction to an employer who only seems to be interested
in getting out of the fact that his employee was injured while at work?
"Or why couldn't it be he simply laid in the yard until he was found?"
makes sense to me. i always feel the need for a dirt nap after picking up material.
as to my personal experience with being shocked, a few years ago, i pulled 14 amps
hand to hand across the chest, in a T bar ceiling. tripped the breaker is why i'm
here typing this today.
i went in for and EKG and blood work, and was off work for about three days.
from what i was told, a bad shock can release potassium in the blood stream,
and sometimes a heart attack can occur within 12 hours of being shocked,
without other symptoms.
i will share with you that it beats the crap out of you, in addition to leaving
every filling in your mouth tasting like copper. and i didn't have any blown
holes or burns, either.
i had a real good connection to the t bar. no excessive heat to damage
the tissues where it entered or exited. just a deep purple discolaration
on my hand, that faded after a few hours.