Saying it's not uncommon for someone to receive an electrical shock is something I should be aware of saying?
Several of you in this thread have posted that you've been shocked many times.
So it's uncommon?
I didn't say we (as electricians) commonly get shocked on a daily basis. But anyone that has done electrical work for any length of time has been shocked many times or you're not being truthful.* It happens.
Or you can sit up on the podium and tell everyone here how you're smarter than everyone else that has ever been shocked. You've been shocked. It's not uncommon. Or you're a wire puller that has never had to troubleshoot a problem in your life. Or lives, if you think you can make us believe that too.
Regardless, lets investigate. Investigator comes in, asks all employees are asked how many times they've been shocked in a certain period of time. Employee 1: Once in the past year. Employee 2: Not sure, maybe a time or 2. Employee 3: Never been shocked. Me: Maybe once in the past year, many times in the past 20 years. So the question is, is it uncommon to be shocked? The word uncommon would be however you look at it. What is uncommon?
Latest on the employee: It was not determined why he passed out. It could have possibly been a delayed reaction to the shock. It could also have been the fact that he was dehydrated.
I think it's the way you phrased it. By saying "It's not uncommon..", the use of a double negative makes the sentence read "It is common". I would say a shock that results in the employee catching fire or having extra orifii is very rare.
An employee says he got shocked, just like we all get shocked at times. Nothing out of the ordinary. There were no holes blown in him, no burns, etc.
It's more to the point that it should be uncommon to get shocked. I doubt lineman and industrial electricians who work with MV and HV are commonly shocked. Not saying you do, but far too many electricians have a cavalier attitude with 120V: working things hot, taking risks they wouldnt if it were 480V, etc.
Any hypothetical investigation isnt going to focus on 'how many times have you been shocked', it's going to find out why the shock happened. and if it's discovered the event occurred because of lax/non-existent safety policies, working hot, being directed to carry out replacement/repairs while eqpt is energized, etc., that's when it's going to be a problem.
As you write, it is possible to receive a shock even tho you have done nothing improper. Worst one I ever got, I put my sweaty bare hand on a portable air compressor (wasnt running but plugged in) that, unbeknownst to me, had a ground fault, and put my other hand on a metal trailer frame. I was locked to the eqpt (120V), fell away when my legs buckled.
* one of the plant electricians I was good friends with used to have this long, red beard. One day he comes in with it shaved smooth. A fault in a 480V cabinet did it. Aside from the flash he was shocked as well, first time in 22 years.
As others have mentioned, if you assign some commonality to the event of electrical shock, what is going to be implied with that is unsafe conditions/actions on your (or your workers') behalf are also common.