brother
Senior Member
Bob
What do you think of 430.83(A)(2) in regards to this topic?
What do you think of my post Pierre about 210.50?? I do agree that 430.83 (A)(2) adresses the circuit breaker as the controller.
Bob
What do you think of 430.83(A)(2) in regards to this topic?
Bob
What do you think of 430.83(A)(2) in regards to this topic?
It seems that to pass inspection all the electrician has to say is the cord and plug is the disconnecting means and the breaker is the controller. Unfortunately we know the HO is going to end up using the plug as a controller. IMO this is a lousy set up but the code does not really address it.
Yeah but he was really thinking of controlling the motor.
I know, and I am very shocked it happened here. :grin:
If you had taken the time to read the thread you would know what I think.:roll: :grin:
Hey, Bob
Don't be upset about the Yanks taking the division. I am sure the Yanks and Boston will be seeing each other again very soon.![]()
I read you post, I posted a different section number than yours.
Sorry I am missing your point, I am fully aware of the section you posted. :-?
You posted 430.83(A)(2) which is about using a breaker as the controller which is allowed, which I have not disagreed with.
I have been saying it is a code legal, yet poor design to leave the HO with virtually no choice but to use the cord and plug as the controller when doing pool maintenance tasks.
I cannot speak for other jurisdictions, but I cannot remember seeing a switch at pool pump locations when they are cord & plug connected. I do not see that as such a bad design.
I cannot speak for other jurisdictions, but I cannot remember seeing a switch at pool pump locations when they are cord & plug connected. I do not see that as such a bad design.
You don't think almost forcing the HO to violate the safety rules of the NEC is a bad design.
Having had pools while growing up, and service pools as a teenager I think not having a switch right beside the other pool controls is extremely poor design.