Disconnecting means

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok I can see that where there is no foundation, empty land and building is going to be built but how can you do 2 in concrete with existing building already built?

You build a form around it and pour in the concrete. The purpose is to not have unprotected conductors running into the building installing a non-fused disconnect as previously mentioned will not solve that problem.

20080209_78.jpg
 
Does a non fused disconnect switch loacted first device on load end of utility meter qualify as service disconnecting means?

Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

I'm confused. If you have space for a disco, why not just make it a fused disco and avoid the controversy?
 
If you have a nonfused disconnect after the meter you still are dealing with service conductors after the disconnect so you must have overcurrent protective device before or as near as possible to the point of entry.
 
I was wondering if NEC 2014 requires mechanical linkage between service fused disconnect near utility meter and main breaker in panel located inside not near point of entry of service conductor?

Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk
 
I was wondering if NEC 2014 requires mechanical linkage between service fused disconnect near utility meter and main breaker in panel located inside not near point of entry of service conductor?

Sent from my SM-G935U using Tapatalk

No, it would make no sense.

Main breaker in panel not even required. You have a main service OCPD in the fused disco. It is protecting the panel already.

Think about it.
 
Panel is double protected. Fuses and breaker-twice. Overkill, not a problem, but waste of money.

Fuses protect feeder (from disco) and panel. A MLO panel would work. Think about it.....

Many times I can buy a main breaker panel with breakers (contractor pack) cheaper than a MLO panel. That's counting having to buy breakers separate for the MLO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top