Doby Industrial Electrician

Status
Not open for further replies.

Doby

Member
We are in the process of installing a new section of the plant and I am running into a code problem. The engineer has calculated that to supply a 1200A sw. gear that we need to run triple 500mcm in 3 DIFFERENT conduits. After checking the tables and finding no deration factors apply since there are not more then 3 current carrying conductors in each raceway, this should produce the desired 1200 amps. The Electrical inspector also agrees, but since this plant is located at a Quarry, it falls under MSHA regulation and they are saying that it has to be derated to 80% and the triple 500mcm is large enough to supply the sw. gear. They also state that this is a NEC requirement, but I can't seem to find it anywhere. I want to know if this is something I am just missing, or is this something that is just a pet peave of this particular MSHA inspector?
 
First, welcome to the forum. Secondly, three sets of 500 MCM is not adequate for a 1200 amp service. Each is only good for 380 amps, so three would be good for 1140 amps. Third, I have to presume you are talking about the three wires in each conduit being a Phase A, a Phase B, and a Phase C (i.e., you are not putting all three Phase A wires in one conduit, etc.). Finally, the NEC does not require any derating under the conditions you describe. I suggest asking the MSHA Inspector to provide a reference for his 80% derating.
 
charlie b said:
First, welcome to the forum. Secondly, three sets of 500 MCM is not adequate for a 1200 amp service. Each is only good for 380 amps, so three would be good for 1140 amps. Third, I have to presume you are talking about the three wires in each conduit being a Phase A, a Phase B, and a Phase C (i.e., you are not putting all three Phase A wires in one conduit, etc.). Finally, the NEC does not require any derating under the conditions you describe. I suggest asking the MSHA Inspector to provide a reference for his 80% derating.

Perhaps the derating that is required for 40C* at the lowest rise of 60C*, became a "rule of tumb" 80%?

On the other hand three 500kCMil @ 90C* rise rating without ambient adjustment would be 1290A.
 
Last edited:
charlie b said:
First, welcome to the forum. Secondly, three sets of 500 MCM is not adequate for a 1200 amp service. Each is only good for 380 amps, so three would be good for 1140 amps. Third, I have to presume you are talking about the three wires in each conduit being a Phase A, a Phase B, and a Phase C (i.e., you are not putting all three Phase A wires in one conduit, etc.). Finally, the NEC does not require any derating under the conditions you describe. I suggest asking the MSHA Inspector to provide a reference for his 80% derating.
Couldn't they just set the trip at 1140 amps?
 
weressl said:
On the other hand three 500kCMil @ 90C* rise rating without ambient adjustment would be 1290A.

If you can find any devices (breaker, panels, disconnect switches etc.) under 600 volts that have 90 C terminals I would love to know about them. :smile:
 
Last edited:
charlie b said:
First, welcome to the forum. Secondly, three sets of 500 MCM is not adequate for a 1200 amp service. Each is only good for 380 amps, so three would be good for 1140 amps. Third, I have to presume you are talking about the three wires in each conduit being a Phase A, a Phase B, and a Phase C (i.e., you are not putting all three Phase A wires in one conduit, etc.). Finally, the NEC does not require any derating under the conditions you describe. I suggest asking the MSHA Inspector to provide a reference for his 80% derating.
Thanks for the welcome. According to table 310.7 for underground, 500mcm copper is good for 427 A. giving me 1281 A. at the mains. This is a straight 3ph, 3 wire system with no neutral.
 
I agree with Bob. Furthermore, if you are trying to use Table B.310.7, then you are in a "3 Electrical Ducts" configuration, not the "1 Electrical Duct" configuration. Without further review of the exact circumstances, I would start with an ampacity of 341 times 3, or 1023 amps total.
 
iwire said:
If you can find any devices (breaker, panels, disconnect switches etc.) under 600 volts that have 90 C terminals I would love to now about them. :smile:

The OP did not define the end connection points.
There are 90C* compression lugs or barrel connectors.
Distribution transformers secondary connections may be equipped with 90C* connectors.
600V switchgears do have 90C* rated connection points.
 
Doby said:
Thanks for the welcome. According to table 310.7 for underground, 500mcm copper is good for 427 A. giving me 1281 A. at the mains. This is a straight 3ph, 3 wire system with no neutral.
The 427 amp rating underground is for 3 conductors in 1 conduit. You indicated there would be 3 conduits. Rating for 3 ckts of 500 kcm in 3 conduits is 341 amps x 3 = 1023 amps.
 
MSHA has their own regulations, which may differ from the NEC. The MSHA
inspectors also have access to written explanations on how to interpret those regulations. They will not show you those interpretations, just the regulations, which your company/engineer? should have.
 
1200Amps?

1200Amps?

Doby said:
Thanks for the welcome. According to table 310.7 for underground, 500mcm copper is good for 427 A. giving me 1281 A. at the mains. This is a straight 3ph, 3 wire system with no neutral.

As pointed out the 500kcm will be good for 1140amps. The breaker lugs will be rated for 75-deg c, so I don't see how you can terminate the 500kcm using a current value higher than the 1140 even if 310.7 gives you a higher rating. Why not install (4) 350kcm which will give you 1240 amps and use a 100% rated breaker if your table 310.7 gives you a value on the 350K that when derated to 80% is still at 1200. I am still looking for the table. 1200amp breakers have lugs for (4) 350's.
 
Last edited:
weressl said:
There are 90C* compression lugs or barrel connectors.
Distribution transformers secondary connections may be equipped with 90C* connectors.

Of course, that is why I did not ask about those products. :grin:

I will happily bet none of those will be used.



600V switchgears do have 90C* rated connection points.

That is news to me but I will take your word for it.

AFAIK the only terminals rated for ampacity calculations at 90 C where above 600 V. :)
 
iwire said:
Of course, that is why I did not ask about those products. :grin:

I will happily bet none of those will be used.

That is news to me but I will take your word for it.

AFAIK the only terminals rated for ampacity calculations at 90 C where above 600 V. :)

Industrial LV switchgear employs withdrawable circuit breakers. The incoming and outgoing cables land on secondary bus extensions equipped with holes to accept any of the varied type bolted connections. There are MANY 600V/90C* rated connectors that can be installed at these points.:cool:
 
weressl said:
Industrial LV switchgear employs withdrawable circuit breakers. The incoming and outgoing cables land on secondary bus extensions equipped with holes to accept any of the varied type bolted connections. There are MANY 600V/90C* rated connectors that can be installed at these points.:cool:

The termination connection point is the important item not the connector.

I know of no UL listed overcurrent protective devices (i.e. UL489 breakers) rated for use with conductors sized using the 90? column even if they use drawout construction.

Switchgear built to ANSI standards is often available for use with conductors sized using the 90? column.
 
jim dungar said:
The termination connection point is the important item not the connector.

That is why is pointed out the bus extentions.

I know of no UL listed overcurrent protective devices (i.e. UL489 breakers) rated for use with conductors sized using the 90? column even if they use drawout construction.


The breakers have nothing to do with the issue since the stationary plug in component is part of ther switchgear and rated to 50C* rise at 40C* ambient.
 
All of the circuit components are required to be rated for 90 degree C, that would also mean the enclosure.

I do not know the MSHA requirements, so disregarding those and ANSI standards, the listing is what will determine the credibility of being able to use the 90 degree C column.

Also, if the engineer stamps his calculations, it is a moot point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top