Just don’t forget about the steel messenger wire when you cut it! Makes a nice notch in your lopers! LOL!
If you do forget, you will be reminded much to the detriment of your tool.
Just don’t forget about the steel messenger wire when you cut it! Makes a nice notch in your lopers! LOL!
Lightning.This is what the old triplex looked like when I took it down!
I don't see SOOW in Table 396.10(A).I used small galvanized cable and soow cord. About a 20 ft span and maybe 10-12 ft above grade. It was whatever the code required.
Neither is triplex, or quadplex, but unlike SOOW they are time proven for OH feeds.I don't see SOOW in Table 396.10(A).
Always something new to learn. NEC article please?Flexible cord would not be permitted as permanent wiring method. There are some exceptions but this is not one of them.
On mine, I splice it at a weatherhead, just like the utility, so the wire going into the building is properly rated. Speaking of overhead, our utility doesn’t want to do overhead anymore, just replacement. I did have them do one last year because their underground crew was backed up a couple of months, and the poco said they could do the overhead the next day. Was free to go overhead, but now they are charging to discourage that practice. Underground is only about $100 more.I never seen anything smaller than 6 AWG.
These overhead multiplexed assemblies typically do not have conductors that comply with 310.104, but many AHJ's either don't know or don't pay too close attention to that.
I put the "plex" cables into "Other factory-assembled, multiconductor control, signal, or power cables that are identified for the use" that is shown in that table.Neither is triplex, or quadplex, but unlike SOOW they are time proven for OH feeds.
400.10 and 400.12Always something new to learn. NEC article please?
SOOW is an art 400 item. See 400.10 uses permitted and 400.12 uses not permitted.Always something new to learn. NEC article please?