Does article 314.29 mean I can't cover junction boxes with insulation?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Before access panels below a jbox seemed to be an issue but it seems that point has been relaxed a
little now.
 
I think now we are at the blown in insulation is part of the building and cannot be move out of the way
to meet code but we can remove access panels and layin ceiling tiles and be ok.
 
ActionDave said:
Can you have a lid over the scuttle hatch into the attic and still be compliant?
Click to expand...

From what I'm understanding,not if you consider the insulation as part of the building and it's covering the
access to your junction boxes.
 
ActionDave said:
Can you have a lid over the scuttle hatch into the attic and still be compliant?
Click to expand...
If you just open the hatch, you are not removing part of the building and that would meet the wording of 314.29. If you have to remove the hatch cover, remove the ceiling tile or remove the insulation to gain access to the box, you have a violation of the wording of 314.29.

Is that really the intent of the code section?? Probably no, but it is, in my opinion, what the words say.
 
Last edited:
don_resqcapt19 said:
If you just open the hatch, you are not removing part of the building and that would meet the wording of 314.29. If you have to remove the hatch cover, remove the ceiling tile or remove the insulation to gain access to the box, you have a violation of the wording of 314.29.

Is that really the intent of the code section?? Probably no, but it is, in my opinion, what the words say.
Click to expand...

So if we just lift up one side of the ceiling tile or pull up one end of the rolled up insulation, as long as the
other end stays in contact with the building we should be good to go with no violations that have been
pointed out in all of the previous posts.
 
It is common for the attic access hatch cover to have insulation on top of it here. It is usually thick rigid foam or batt insulation and not loose fill, otherwise loose fill falls all over the place when removing the hatch cover. How do you gain access to attic (and any junction boxes in the attic) without moving that insulation?
 
At some point you have to draw the line between gaining access to the attic and gaining access to
junction boxes.
 
jap said:
At some point you have to draw the line between gaining access to the attic and gaining access to
junction boxes.
Click to expand...
Sometimes you need to gain access to the front door before either of the others is even much of a possiblilty:happyyes:
 
Dont even bring it up Kwired. I hope no insulation boards blow up against the door of my truck when
I pull onto the jobsite and cant get to my codebook to make an educated decision on what to do next.
 
jap said:
Dont even bring it up Kwired. I hope no insulation boards blow up against the door of my truck when
I pull onto the jobsite and cant get to my codebook to make an educated decision on what to do next.
Click to expand...

I keep my codebook next to the seat for just such an emergency.

Mark
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
If you just open the hatch, you are not removing part of the building and that would meet the wording of 314.29. If you have to remove the hatch cover, remove the ceiling tile or remove the insulation to gain access to the box, you have a violation of the wording of 314.29.

Is that really the intent of the code section?? Probably no, but it is, in my opinion, what the words say.
Click to expand...

I hate to say you are taking this a bit too literally, but is an access panel that is designed to allow access part of a building? I'd say it's more part of a building than insulation or ceiling tiles. I need a screwdriver to pry the panel out of an access panel. Are they not allowed either?

I agree that you are reading the words correctly, but what's in question is the definition of "building".

Mark
 
busman said:
I hate to say you are taking this a bit too literally, but is an access panel that is designed to allow access part of a building? I'd say it's more part of a building than insulation or ceiling tiles. I need a screwdriver to pry the panel out of an access panel. Are they not allowed either?

I agree that you are reading the words correctly, but what's in question is the definition of "building".

Mark
Click to expand...
What is the meaning of "is"? :D
 
The verbiage for this code section has remaind virtually unchanged for over 80 years, and I would consider that to be an indication that it has never been in contension as to what the intent is. Based on the verbiage of Accessable (as applied to wiring methods) I do not believe there to be any question as to its intent in regaurds to gaining the accessability to the wiring inside the boxes, conduit bodies, and handhole enclosures for future needs.
 
~ = ~

I'm wondering if **Johnny123** has continued to read all of
the input on this topic, and as importantly, ...did he get an
answer to his OP, along with a code section to support his
install.

As an aside, ...don't know how much thermal insulation would
[ typically ] be installed on some junction boxes, but would
a thick layer; saaaaaay `tween 8"-12", installed over a
covered junction box affect the temperture ratings of the
conductors?

~ = ~
 
Last edited:
Gregg Harris said:
The verbiage for this code section has remaind virtually unchanged for over 80 years, and I would consider that to be an indication that it has never been in contension as to what the intent is. Based on the verbiage of Accessable (as applied to wiring methods) I do not believe there to be any question as to its intent in regaurds to gaining the accessability to the wiring inside the boxes, conduit bodies, and handhole enclosures for future needs.
Click to expand...

So what do you feel the intent is?
 
Gregg Harris said:
The verbiage for this code section has remaind virtually unchanged for over 80 years, and I would consider that to be an indication that it has never been in contension as to what the intent is. Based on the verbiage of Accessable (as applied to wiring methods) I do not believe there to be any question as to its intent in regaurds to gaining the accessability to the wiring inside the boxes, conduit bodies, and handhole enclosures for future needs.
Click to expand...
As far as removable panels, I would agree that you have the intent correct.

I don't agree that the intent is to permit the junction box to be covered by insulation.
 
jap said:
So what do you feel the intent is?
Click to expand...
Accessible (as applied to wiring methods).


Capable of being removed or exposed without damaging the building structure or finish or not permanently closed in by the structure or finish of the building.

If the cover of the box is covered by insulation it can be exposed by moving the insulation and then putting it back without damage to the building structure or finish, and it would not be permanently closed in by the ceiling tile, access panel or between framing members that would prevent access.

Now with all that being said, attic spaces that are being encapsulated with sprayed thermal barriers does need to be addressed.

And as Roger noted there is an amendment to 314.29 in Washington that disallows insulation over boxes etc. It is the only one I am aware of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top