No supervisor/foreman in your company?As a matter of company safety policy I have worked under, 'apprentices' do not assist in live work activities.
No supervisor/foreman in your company?As a matter of company safety policy I have worked under, 'apprentices' do not assist in live work activities.
It doesn't matter, apprentices or trainees are not permitted to do live work, no matter how many qualified people are there watching the work.No supervisor/foreman in your company?
he/she would still be a trainee and so a novice.
No supervisor/foreman in your company?
It doesn't matter, apprentices or trainees are not permitted to do live work, no matter how many qualified people are there watching the work.
I mean the trainer doing the live work while the trainees are there watching the work and helping him to do the work and also doing the work along with him.
The IEEE rule below does not ban it,
as those trainees are considered 'qualified' by it.
IEEE C2 (2012)
Qualified: Having been trained in and having demonstrated adequate knowledge of the installation, constmction, or operation of lines and equipment and the hazards involved, including identification of and exposure to electric supply and communication lines and equipment in or near the workplace. An employee who is undergoing on-the-job training and who, in the course of such training, has demonstrated an ability to perform duties safely at his or her level of training, and who is under the direct supervision of a qualified person, is considered to be a qualified person for the performance of those duties.
The 225A designation is asinine: That current value has nothing to do with the shock risk, so I fail to see why that would come into play. If there concern is arc flash then they need to have a flash-hazard analysis performed, because arbitrarily selecting 225A does absolutely nothing to tell you what kind of incident-energy a worker could be exposed to; someone could still be very severely burned below that threshold.
State the OSHA rule or at least its number.I have to comply with OSHA rules. https://www.osha.gov/ OSHA is not a 'recommended standard' it is Federal law in the US.
Thanks for pointing out about the fake zip code. I tried to fill it up with the pin-code of my location in India as the zip-code is a required field. So now I changed it 00000 to satisfy the program.I find it funny you keep fighting this as when I look at your profile it states you are a tel com engineer with a fake zip code which, when taken with your name leads me to believe you live outside the US.
Yes I have no first hand experience with live electrical work procedures in the US. But this does not prevent me to question the stupidity in your way of doing work.I doubt you have any first hand experience with live electrical work procedures in the US.
State the OSHA rule or at least its number.
Thanks for pointing out about the fake zip code. I tried to fill it up with the pin-code of my location in India as the zip-code is a required field. So now I changed it 00000 to satisfy the program.
Yes I have no first hand experience with live electrical work procedures in the US. But this does not prevent me to question the stupidity in your way of doing work.
State the OSHA rule or at least its number.
1910.333(c)(2)
"Work on energized equipment." Only qualified persons may work on electric circuit parts or equipment that have not been deenergized under the procedures of paragraph (b) of this section. Such persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding materials, and insulated tools.
OSHA 1926.32(m)
"Qualified" means one who, by possession of a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or who by extensive knowledge, training, and experience, has successfully demonstrated his ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the subject matter, the work, or the project.
Thanks for pointing out about the fake zip code. I tried to fill it up with the pin-code of my location in India as the zip-code is a required field. So now I changed it 00000 to satisfy the program.
Yes I have no first hand experience with live electrical work procedures in the US. But this does not prevent me to question the stupidity in your way of doing work.
thats ok Haji
too many electricians fall into the same mud hole of slamming others who are asking questions about a different country and their electrical system!
I run into that a lot on british and australian forums as well
rather than argue a point and get a bunch of abuse. you can just suggest the difference whether they listen to it or not
1910.333(c)(2)
"Work on energized equipment." Only qualified persons may work on electric circuit parts or equipment that have not been deenergized under the procedures of paragraph (b) of this section. Such persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding materials, and insulated tools.
OSHA 1926.32(m)
"Qualified" means one who, by possession of a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or who by extensive knowledge, training, and experience, has successfully demonstrated his ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the subject matter, the work, or the project.
Notice qualified is by no means a novice or trainee.
It is rather a pity that you still do not see how expertise is transferred from one person to another.:lol: Well it should prevent you from calling our methods stupid.
You can certainly question our methods but to decide something is stupid without any experience with it at all seems rather ...... stupid.
Read again. The OSHA considers a person fresh from college with a degree also as ''qualified''. So he should not be considered as novice or trainee. Your company should allow him to work with you on live work.
It is rather a pity that you still do not see how expertise is transferred from one person to another.
Which college in the world offers electrical degree on live work?!You are absoulty correct, as long as that college degree is about doing live work.
Oh no, you do not get it. As a starter, I would recommend the following book to get an idea.I train apprentices so you are dead wrong on my understanding of it.
Which college in the world offers electrical degree on live work?!
Answer:None.
Oh no, you do not get it. As a starter, I would recommend the following book to get an idea.
http://www.amazon.in/Deep-Smarts-Cul.../dp/1591395283
You think OSHA officials are foolish enough to state recognized degree holders who, by possession of such a degree, has successfully demonstrated his ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the subject matter, the work, or the project and so are qualified to do energized work.I would bet you are correct.
So college degree holders cannot do live work with me until they have received training and demonstrated their knowledge in that specific subject.
See how easy it is?
Yes I have no first hand experience with live electrical work procedures in the US.
But this does not prevent me to question the stupidity in your way of doing work.
You think OSHA officials are foolish enough to state recognized degree holders who, by possession of such a degree, has successfully demonstrated his ability to solve or resolve problems relating to the subject matter, the work, or the project and so are qualified to do energized work.
The terms laid out in the OSHA standard are possibilities, not guarantees: It is possible a person may be effectively qualified by degree or certificate, but it is absolutely not a guarantee that a degree or certificate qualifies a person.Which college in the world offers electrical degree on live work?!
Answer:None...
Following that guideline, even electricians with the same licenses will not always be qualified the same way because of different work experiences. E.g., I often see licensed guys who have little knowledge of >1000V equipment, who would be frankly unqualified to work on it because their training did not address that.One who has the demonstrated skills and knowledge related to the construction and operation of electrical equipment and installations and has received safety training to identify and avoid the hazards involved.
I just cant figure out why someone with out any experience with the rules is fighting so hard against the answers he is receiving.
It is always great to learn new things, I thing Haji would be wise to take note.
And if someone wants to endanger themselves, that is their choice. These laws are in place to help prevent employers from compelling their workers into dangerous acts and exposing their customers to significant liability.IMHO - Arc Flash restriction is out of control. I don't advocate working dangerously BUT most of us voluntarily take much bigger risks in sports, driving and living than a code writer would allow in the work place....