EMT CONNECTOR

Status
Not open for further replies.
By design, your desire doesn't make sense. You couldn't screw two locknuts on an EMT connector, nor would you even need two.
Spec calls for it. It's security system conduits. Why couldn't you do it by design? Looks like it'll fit on threads

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
Spec calls for it. It's security system conduits. Why couldn't you do it by design? Looks like it'll fit on threads

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Are they actually asking for conduit or tubing?

Roger
 
Conduit EMT they want ..isn't that tubing . I know what you meant though

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
So they specifically call out EMT? What is the actual wording of the spec?

Roger
 
Spec calls for it. It's security system conduits. Why couldn't you do it by design? Looks like it'll fit on threads

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

What are they trying to accomplish with the second lock nut? A properly installed lock nut shouldn't vibrate loose ( it is designed to dig into the metal of the box). If that's their concern I would think that a locking compound on the threads would serve better (not needed).
 
What are they trying to accomplish with the second lock nut? A properly installed lock nut shouldn't vibrate loose ( it is designed to dig into the metal of the box). If that's their concern I would think that a locking compound on the threads would serve better (not needed).
Thanks

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
EMT is not conduit. If they are asking for conduit you would not be able to use EMT.

I agree with you from a technically correct position, however, as an estimator I have seen EMT referred to as conduit more often than not. For example, "All wiring shall be in conduit." Then specifying EMT in walls, PVC under slab, etc. or even 3-3/0, #6G in 2" EMT Cond. on a feeder. So, I wouldn't dwell on that technicality.
 
I agree with you from a technically correct position, however, as an estimator I have seen EMT referred to as conduit more often than not. For example, "All wiring shall be in conduit." Then specifying EMT in walls, PVC under slab, etc. or even 3-3/0, #6G in 2" EMT Cond. on a feeder. So, I wouldn't dwell on that technicality.

But we do that so well....... ;)
 
I agree with you from a technically correct position, however, as an estimator I have seen EMT referred to as conduit more often than not. For example, "All wiring shall be in conduit." Then specifying EMT in walls, PVC under slab, etc. or even 3-3/0, #6G in 2" EMT Cond. on a feeder. So, I wouldn't dwell on that technicality.

I can't ever recall having seen EMT referred to as conduit in a spec.

I have seen where specs say something like "unless otherwise noted, all conduit shall be in rigid...", and then having some places in the spec where it will allow for other kinds of raceways in certain cases like using PVC UG.
 
I can't ever recall having seen EMT referred to as conduit in a spec.

I have seen where specs say something like "unless otherwise noted, all conduit shall be in rigid...", and then having some places in the spec where it will allow for other kinds of raceways in certain cases like using PVC UG.
Here you go. From a job I am working. Took me less than 5 minutes.

Outdoors: Apply raceway products as specified below, unless otherwise indicated: 1. Exposed Conduit: Rigid steel conduit or IMC or RNC.
2. Concealed Conduit, Aboveground: Rigid steel conduit, IMC, EMT, RNC,
Type EPC-40-PVC.
3. Underground Conduit: RNC, Type EPC-PVC, direct buried.
4. Connection to Vibrating Equipment (Including Transformers and Hydraulic,
Pneumatic, Electric Solenoid, or Motor-Driven Equipment): LFMC.
5. Boxes and Enclosures, Aboveground: NEMA 250, Type 3R.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top