Nope.It is a specific equation for the limited application of vertical flow.
It's general.
If you think it's incorrect, then I once again invite you to post what you believe to be the correct equation.
Nope.It is a specific equation for the limited application of vertical flow.
Here's one website you guys should visit......post what you believe to be the correct equation.
Another excellent example of why to go SI.
Bes, I'm going to step away from the discussion for a few hours to do something with my son. In the mean time, I would invite you (actually beg you) to take a closer look at what you are saying here. I am throwing away the posting that I started to write here in order to give you some more time to think about this.Nope.
It's general.
If you think it's incorrect, then I once again invite you to post what you believe to be the correct equation.
You disputed its general validity.I am not challenging your equation, .
I'm having a good weekend with my son, so I have decided that I am not going to bother trying to argue with you and spoil it. However, I will at least point out that I have repeatedly mentioned the "g" (acceleration of gravity) term that you have yet to address.You disputed its general validity.
If you think you have a better equation then please post it.
Hope what you are going to to do with your son goes well for both.
Not quite right.A cage induction motor takes typically about 30% of full load current even running uncoupled.
Jumping in here to ask- If the pump (or fan, since that is what the OP was asking) is stopped from doing any work, other than keeping its moving parts moving, why do the amps go through the roof?.... All you have to do to see it is correct is to take the pump that your equation is discussing and block the outlet and see how high the amperage rises. It will go through the roof.
Jumping in here to ask- If the pump (or fan, since that is what the OP was asking) is stopped from doing any work, other than keeping its moving parts moving, why do the amps go through the roof?
You need mass to calculate power.I'm having a good weekend with my son, so I have decided that I am not going to bother trying to argue with you and spoil it. However, I will at least point out that I have repeatedly mentioned the "g" (acceleration of gravity) term that you have yet to address.
I wouldn't dispute that. I don't very often deal with motors smaller than a few tens of kW.A fractional HP motor will draw almost all it's FLA unloaded, but for motors above 1 or 2 HP it will draw 30% of its FLA unloaded.
The "system" isn't doing work, but that doesn't mean the "motor" isn't doing work. That is the problem that is being overlooked in many of the original responses.Jumping in here to ask- If the pump (or fan, since that is what the OP was asking) is stopped from doing any work, other than keeping its moving parts moving, why do the amps go through the roof?
bpk said:This maybe more of an engineering / physics question but when a fan such as ID fan or squirrel cage is restricted on the airflow inlet side, such as louvers or dirty filters, does the fan draw less power. If so what about being restricted on the output side ? Thanks in advance
All you have to do to see it is correct is to take the pump that your equation is discussing and block the outlet and see how high the amperage rises. It will go through the roof.
OK, if you say so. But why do you need WEIGHT?You need mass to calculate power.
And, yet again, if the think the formula is invalid, please post what you think is right.
To get mass, of course.OK, if you say so. But why do you need WEIGHT?
Equations are everything unless domestic tranquillity is involved.I dunno crap about about pump/ fan flow equations, but I know that if I forget to change the AHU filter and the cooling/heating don't work my wife threatens to throw me off the roof.
No. The question stands. Why does your equation need a weight?To get mass, of course.
Let me give you a very simple statement to demonstrate the difference between weight and mass.
A force of one newton acting on a mass of one kilogram fives it an acceleration of one metre per second.
That force would give that 1kg mass the same acceleration here on earth or on the moon. But the weight would be much less on the moon.
Now, instead of disputing the formula, why don't you simply provide the one you believe to be correct.
Enjoy your day with your sun.