It was actually 9V but I'm not suggesting that it is typical or has any general validity. I just thought it would be a fun thing to try.GREAT! I have heard low voltage ohm testing will not read correctly; need higher voltages than 1.5v
It was actually 9V but I'm not suggesting that it is typical or has any general validity. I just thought it would be a fun thing to try.GREAT! I have heard low voltage ohm testing will not read correctly; need higher voltages than 1.5v
The resistances of two earth electrodes spaced sufficiently apart combine in parallel. The two and done rule purpose is redundancy, IMHO.
is two rods much better?
in any case, it is not useless. the ground rod seller made a few pennies from you.
How far down to the water table?
Mike's video on driving deeper and deeper ground rods by his house in FL is interesting and also provides a good feel for the measurement techniques available. As I recall he got all the way down to 50 feet.
I know they combine in parallel. My point is, if 1 rod's contact resistance is significantly more than 50 ohms (such as 100 ohms), and 25 ohms are required, why do we get to follow the "two and done" rule? I would think we'd have to continue driving rods, until the total resistance is less than the requisite 25 Ohms. Or use another electrode.
Because 100 ohms combined in parallel with another 100 ohms, IS NOT 25 ohms.
Actually resistivity is considered constant in the paper and resistance varies over distance, the variation becoming less and less as distance from earth rod goes on increasing.The calculations show that the total resistivity approaches a limiting value as the volume of soil considered increases, and is >90% of the limiting value 4 rod lengths away.As far as the resistance to 'distant earth' is concerned, the resistance measured at a mile and 1000 miles will be the same.-Jon
If 25 ohm is not achieved by one rod, another one may be installed. But the code does not require the combined resistance be less than 25ohm because the method of grounding adopted in US ie TN-S system does nor require low earth resistance.
So there is no physical reason why the requirement concedes "it is good enough" after two rods, even if the combined resistance is still well above the requirement for just one rod. It just is the way it is, because the grounding rules in the US say so.
Yesterday evening I posted that I was going to test our soil today. I did so.
FWIW, I got about 4k ohm in damp soil. It has rained a lot here recently.
See post #41.R or p resistivity?
what distance and area?
See post #41.
It was done just for fun, not in depth analyses.does not answer my question
how far were the probes apart
a vom meter just stuck in soil?
It was done just for fun, not in depth analyses.
soooooo? No distance?
lol
very good primer http://assets.tequipment.net/assets/3/7/GettingDownToEarth.pdf
and the concept is simple but actual calculation complex
Basic relationship
R = p L /A
p = resistivity
L = length or distance between points of interest
S area of material i flows thru
A simplified example (numbers vary on field shape, etc)
assume 2 driven rods or plates on surface
impressed voltage across them
current flow and a voltage drop occurs
i can be a density A/sq ft
v a gradient v/ft
the shape is not unlike an American football
ovoid
the closer the rods the narrower, farther = wider
A can be described as a function of L
if L = 100 the max dia of the field is ~ L/2 for example
but we must use an avg dia, 0 at the ends L/2 middle
call avg L/4 so A = Pi (L/4 / 2)^2 = L^2/20
so R = p L / (L^2 /20) = p 20/L
so as L increases R decreases
measured a field today
not the field but the connection on a wye genset
substation 1 mva wye xfmr w/3 Ohm ground bed
1 mva wye genset on concrete pad 100' away (not on sub bed)
bolted to pad via studs welded to rebar
both feed a xfer sw which supplies a 500 hp fan
gen neut 4/0 Cu to sub bed in pvc
used the attached clamp on at the gen wye
Loop = 4/0 to sub bed back through earth to pad to gen skid to wye gen point thru internal wye bonding jumper
1.7 Ohm
ignoring metallic segments earth R path is ~1.7 Ohm or less
FWIW in the way of an actual number:
Have a concrete encased ground in own house, I tack welded the footing rebar together also (although contrary to IRC about welding).
Resistance to overall POCO grounding system (which is every other ground in parallel within a few miles?) is 0.61 ohms. Measured that resistance by connecting a big 10 ohm resistor between 120 Vac and the rebar and measuring the current then calculating he 0.61 ohms.
Footing is 20 inches to 30 in wide, 210 ft total length at 5 to 8 feet deep (e.g. 420 ft of rebar as ground), 3/4 of which is below the water table on hardpan.
Most of footing being at or near the ground water table probably makes for a much better ground that a rod or 2 in the dry sand in Tucson :lol: