Rewire
Senior Member
- Location
- Lake of the Ozarks
I install a receptacle in the wall .
Rewire said:I install a receptacle in the wall .
Vinniem said:I always like to install a switch for the disposal in the cabinet so mounting it in the wall is never a option for me.
we had to many complaints on this set up so we went to over counter switch.,Vinniem said:I always like to install a switch for the disposal in the cabinet so mounting it in the wall is never a option for me.
Then fish it... or go with the continuous feed disposer/air switch setup.stickboy1375 said:Yeah, that is nice to do at rough in, this was probably added after the fact...
tallguy said:Then fish it... or go with the continuous feed disposer/air switch setup.
Pierre C Belarge said:In that case, then Carflex would be subject to the same physical damage.
Dennis Alwon said:So -- tell me what you do under your kitchen cabinets that you can actually cut thru carflex and then get into the NM cable and damage it.
I am sorry but this is ludicrous to think that carflex is not suitable under a sink. You have the right to your opinion but I cannot agree one bit with that.
Pierre C Belarge said:If you look at the use permitted and the uses not permitted, you will see that carflex as well as NM cable is not permitted to be installed where subject to physical damage. I do realize that there are different types of physical damage.
In the example I gave, the damage may not be cutting, but the carflex/cable being stressed and pulled out of the fitting causing damage and possibly a spark of shock hazard. I wonder, is that so ludicrous?
stickboy1375 said:Code is code, you can't just pick the ones you like...
Dennis Alwon said:I guess Galvanized pipe would be called for to really protect it.:roll: I strap the carflex and use a 90 degree fitting going back toward the drains. I think it would be next to impossible to yank that cable out and do damage to anything unless you have parties under your sink.
Pierre C Belarge said:You do not give man enough credit for thier ingenious ways.
Pierre C Belarge said:This second picture is not the greatest example, as I have pictures of worse situations with people cramming tons more under the sink, but I am sure you get the idea.
Pierre C Belarge said:If you look at the use permitted and the uses not permitted, you will see that carflex as well as NM cable is not permitted to be installed where subject to physical damage. I do realize that there are different types of physical damage.
In the example I gave, the damage may not be cutting, but the carflex/cable being stressed and pulled out of the fitting causing damage and possibly a spark of shock hazard. I wonder, is that so ludicrous?
bradleyelectric said:physical damage= able to have a car driven into it. I'm thinking that if they drive a car into the kitchen sink, the fact I only used nm will not be a big factor. the car is not usually there. I use nm, and have never failed due to it. It is strapped nicely and not left to dangle to catch on and be in the way of everything in the cabinet. It's just a cord and plug device under the cabinet with the cord being nm, strapped along the drain pipe, with the cord plugged into a surface mount duplex that has a small piece of mn from where the cable enters the cabinet and enters the handy box.
480sparky said:I gotta ask what the two white cords are for. Hopefully not for the disposal! And why do they look like they run into the top of the back two 4-11/16 boxes through a PVC fitting?
Pierre C Belarge said:Can you direct me to where you found that definition of physical damage?