kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
- Occupation
- EC
That is not an application that is required to be irreversible.
That is not an application that is required to be irreversible.
Pedro, I think Jaggedben has an interesting point. This piques my curiousity.equipment grounding conductor, not GEC.
That is probably a solar gec.equipment grounding conductor, not GEC.
Here is a link to Burndy connectors that are listed for grounding. UL467
http://ecat.burndy.com/Comergent//fci/documentation/2010_mc_section_e-grounding.pdf
equipment grounding conductor, not GEC.
I spent some time looking for a document on these splice caps. I didn't find anything I could link to, where I looked, at the Ideal / Buchannan site.I think that if something is UL listed as grounding and bonding equipment then that means for both GEC and EGC, so how I was using it is not relevant.
I spent some time looking for a document on these splice caps. I didn't find anything I could link to, where I looked, at the Ideal / Buchannan site.
Maybe you have something? Maybe I'm looking in the wrong site?
Thanks for that. I'd overlooked that part of your photo. That's good enough documentation for me. So, in considering the GEC splicing rule, 250.64(C)(1), and its phrase, "listed as grounding and bonding equipment", is the splice cap "UL listed for grounding equipment" equivalent?Yeah, I couldn't find the bit that says "UL listed for grounding equipment" anywhere except on the box in the picture.
Buchanan is Ideal, right?
With a catalog number you can look here and see if it is listed. Catagory code KDER is Grounding and Bonding Equipment. There are four files to look through.
So if it's in there youa re good. It doesn't have to be listed for GEC splice, just grounding and Bonding
http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/cgifind.new/LISEXT/1FRAME/srchres.html