- Location
- Massachusetts
480sparky said:Mine is not to question why, mine is but to do and die.
Tough inspection department.:grin:
480sparky said:Mine is not to question why, mine is but to do and die.
Dennis Alwon said:I don't understand this EGC. We have EGC's on the bathroom recep yet we are still required to have GFCI. Why would the EGC negate the use of GFCI. I understand it is not necessary on the lights over a shower but ....
A fan over a shower has an EGC yet it still requires GFCI protection.
iwire said:Tough inspection department.:grin:
stickboy1375 said:I just don't see the need for GFCI protection on a luminaire in a bathroom that has a EGC... do you?
stickboy1375 said:I just don't see the need for GFCI protection on a luminaire in a bathroom that has a EGC... do you?
Dennis Alwon said:No I don't see the need for GFCI in a bathroom fan either and it has an EGC. I am just wondering. Sure an EGC makes the light safer in a shower but why does it not on the fan???:-?
stickboy1375 said:I had these installed over a tub and failed inspection... anyone wanna take a guess why?
480sparky said:Trim is not rated for damp locations.
stickboy1375 said:
I had these installed over a tub and failed inspection... anyone wanna take a guess why?
Dennis Alwon said:My buddy just had the same experience. They wanted wet location over the tub. I called them and said nope... Then they wanted a wet location bulb-- I guess they meant par lamp. Finally we got them to understand. Halo cans with the open trim are rated for damp location-- no problem unless it is a shower and subject to spray--- of course that is quite subjective also.
480sparky said:Mine is not to question why, mine is but to do and die.
LawnGuyLandSparky said:Man they're strict!
Since the main subject seems to be fished out, I'll venture down your sidebar.goldstar said:Just a side bar, try using Juno 5" cans w/ flat shower trims and 50 watt PAR 30 short neck bulbs (you'll spend a few more $$ though). They throw off a lot more light. If I remember correctly Halo restricts you to a 40 watt A-bulb when using a shower trim.
stickboy1375 said:I just don't see the need for GFCI protection on a luminaire in a bathroom that has a EGC... do you?
georgestolz said:I put a 90W equivalent CFL in my bath shower can, and that is nice. It may take it a minute to warm up, but once it's there, you could operate in there.
brother said:This halo shower light is the first i ever hear of a manufacturer not requiring gfci protection.
brother said:I can see why they may require it, its just another level of safety and it makes sense to me. I dont beleive anyone would try to change lamps while showering, but the heat and steam/from the water in the shower i believe might take its toll. Yes the egc should be able to clear the fault, but ive seen where the egc was corroded and got weaken and it did not in some of these residential homes. Water can be a funny acting obstacle.
Dennis, it's a 23W compact fluorescent lamp. I can install a 75W incandescent lamp in it's place. It's rated for wet locations, and the trim is rated for damp locations. What's the issue?Dennis Alwon said:And is the can rated for such use. For that matter is the CFL rated for a recessed can. Most are not, however ther are some that are rated for that install.
georgestolz said:Dennis, it's a 23W compact fluorescent lamp. I can install a 75W incandescent lamp in it's place. It's rated for wet locations, and the trim is rated for damp locations. What's the issue?