Yes, you did.Correct.....BTW, I did explain that in a follow-up post!
And FWIW, this is actually an NEC requirement for outside branch circuits and feeders [225.19(D)(1)]. Seems odd the NEC requirement for service conductors is more lax...
Yes, you did.Correct.....BTW, I did explain that in a follow-up post!
I agree, most third party payers are more interested in the job being done by someone trust worthy and price is not an issue at all.I don't get that one at all. What is the increased risk?
Back to Op, if the mast is not continuous to the meter socket, it is not a raceway, it is simply a metal tubular support. If you were to put up strut channel or angle iron as a support would you still have same question?
The rules for raceway type masts are just there because the raceway happens to be supporting the service drop. If something else is supporting the service drop so what. If it is metallic it may or may not be required to be bonded to the grounded conductor, but is certainly not a bad idea to do so.
If clearance is needed over a street (which I think someone brought up) that very well may be an issue for the POCO more so than for the owner to provide a high mast at the house, that doesn't necessarily mean POCO can't charge the customer for providing a solution though.
Does not matter that funding for this may come from some third party that is there to help. Those organizations that do provide this kind of help in my experiences are not looking for "cheap" either. They usually take into consideration what is actually needed, what is outdated, worn out, changes in codes and standards over the years, etc. They also may consider what will be better investment over time instead of just putting on the cheapest band-aid they can find.
During a fire, using the window as egress and the SEC as support in doing so.
I'm not going to defend such a requirement wholeheartedly either... but we're talking during a fire which can impact both structural and insulation integrity... enough said...???A raceway could be used as support in similar circumstance also, I still don't see why SE cable would be significantly more dangerous.
If you had a fire every day and had to egress out that window each time - maybe then it would be worth worrying about.
:lol: LOL :lol:Besides if the cable is more than three feet away just what am I supposed to grab a hold of?
Service drops need to be higher at the house than at the street or alley as well as within easy reach of windows, balconies, etc., that way you can use them as a zip line in an emergency egress situation
I'm not going to defend such a requirement wholeheartedly either... but we're talking during a fire which can impact both structural and insulation integrity... enough said...???
:lol: LOL :lol:
What about a rescuer?If the cable has been that hot already when you are trying to egress through that window you will not be going through that window, unless it is last resort and you are just going to make a run toward the window then jump and hope for the best. But chances are at that point you have been overcome by fumes and are unconscious. This is all assuming you have already ruled out escaping through the interior door to the room you are in.
What about a rescuer?
Rationalize all you want. Others will continue to have varied opinions.
I intentionally used the term rescuer to include other than firefighters.Hopefully the fire fighter removed the meter before trying to rescue you through that window.
What about a rescuer?
Rationalize all you want. Others will continue to have varied opinions.
LOL......
If I needed to grab hold of something, I would like to think an SE cable will support me better than a 2 pair telephone cable ran in same location would:happyyes:
I dont know about you all but if I'm inside a burning house and my windows stuck and I see a fireman or "Rescuer" heading toward my window in an attempt to help me, and he hesitates at the last minute , makes a sharp turn away from the window pulls out his side cutters to cut the seal and remove the meter before he finishes his heroic act,,,,,, he better hope I dont survive my last ditch effort of jumping out the window.
Hopefully the fire fighter removed the meter ....
If the firefighter isn't trained in the fact that pulling meter does not disconnect the overhead service drop to the structure, I wonder what other actions may be inappropriately employed.
It seems a lot of electricians from the south, think that everyone likes to or is required to have disconnects outside with the meter.
I guess they don't realize how common outdoor sockets and indoor disconnects really are, nor how many northern residential installations use cable instead of pipes.
If the firefighter isn't trained in the fact that pulling meter does not disconnect the overhead service drop to the structure, I wonder what other actions may be inappropriately employed.
Why? Do you have problems with comprehension of my posts?:?Now what are you saying?