Coppersmith
Senior Member
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor
I was reading a news article on the CROWN act which prohibits discrimination based on hair styles favored by non-whites. This bill recently passed in the House. I'm against discrimination so I favor of this legislation, but toward the bottom of the article there was a discussion of dreadlocks and I realized this might have a negative effect my business.
When I'm hiring service truck electricians, I have a long list of requirements including that they are neatly groomed (regardless of race). I think poor grooming reflects badly on the company in the eyes of my clients. This does not disqualify people with big beards as long as they are neat. This does not disqualify people with pink hair as long as it is neat. And this does not disqualify people with dreadlocks or any other Black hairstyle as long as it is neat.
The problem is I have seen many instances of gross, nasty dreadlocks. I would not want to hire somebody who looks like they have never brushed their hair and just let it become a giant matted mess. Am I being prejudiced? Do I have a legitimate concern?
When I'm hiring service truck electricians, I have a long list of requirements including that they are neatly groomed (regardless of race). I think poor grooming reflects badly on the company in the eyes of my clients. This does not disqualify people with big beards as long as they are neat. This does not disqualify people with pink hair as long as it is neat. And this does not disqualify people with dreadlocks or any other Black hairstyle as long as it is neat.
The problem is I have seen many instances of gross, nasty dreadlocks. I would not want to hire somebody who looks like they have never brushed their hair and just let it become a giant matted mess. Am I being prejudiced? Do I have a legitimate concern?