- Location
- Massachusetts
I would say they belong in the special interest group.
Oh the irony.
I would say they belong in the special interest group.
You're right. It's drastic enough that you need to account for it. It's weird, when I started in this business in 2005 I didn't proposed project based on Mean Lumens. Lumen maintenance was so good with PS/MH and T8 there really wasn't much need to. Now we're talking about Lumen Maintenance being a huge factor in the these we do. To me, that's going backwards.
I'm firmly entrenched on the LED bandwagon when it comes to replacing low wattage HID, but the lumen maintenance issue is simply too big to ignore. I'm still a skeptic with most LED and almost all induction (which seems to not be dropping in price as swiftly as LED). Metal Halide has dimming options and a great track record, so when it comes to pole lighting that's my go-to solution.
Great info, wish you were local to me so I could give you some business. I'm looking at dimmable metal halide as a possible solution to parking lot pole lighting at my buildings, how do potential energy savings stack up vs. standard metal halide?
I would say they belong in the special interest group. We can't accommodate around every special interest group.
An induction lamp has the same ten years plus life as LED but less costly. So if cost is the prime consideration, the induction lamp is to be preferred.
I'd like to know who has fixtures availble for purchase today that produce 130lm/w.
How about the combination induction bulb/built-in ballasts, are they rated for exterior use? I am considering these for courtyard lighting, bollard type fixtures, to replace 70 watt HID's