mcclary's electrical
Senior Member
- Location
- VA
I think the solution is to replace the attic insulation with gravel, light aggregate, or noncohesive granulated soil as stated above. Apparently it can be disturbed.![]()
That is for out door boxes
I think the solution is to replace the attic insulation with gravel, light aggregate, or noncohesive granulated soil as stated above. Apparently it can be disturbed.![]()
I really did lol at that one, not just saying thatCan I bring up whether it's OK to have the service mast inside the wall of a structure?
I just love these 4 page debates :grin:
are building features the same as structural features?So it is left up to me to simply assume that you cannot prove your stance using the NEC.
Copied from post 145
Panel Statement:
The panel continues to reject the proposal because the NEC
does not allow boxes to be installed in an area hidden by structural features.
The panel makes the statement that no box can be hidden by the building features.
Blown insulation in the attic is one of the buildings features plain and simple. This is and has been the stance of the code panel for more years that we are old.
Are you saying I need to put outdoor boxes in attics for junctions?That is for out door boxes
That is for out door boxes
I realize that. I was trying to be sarcastic. It is pretty amazing that we can have a thread that is approaching the 200 mark on moving or not moving attic insulation. I still stand by my post on replacing the attic insulation with gravel, light aggregate, or noncohesive granulated soil. In these tough economic times maybe we can all start growing mushrooms in the attic. Just add a little compost and fertilizer both which could be taken from this thread, drag up the hose every other day or so and presto! You now have a little extra income when you sell them babies at the local farmers market next weekend. Thanks for listening.
I'm not real clear on what you are saying. Are you trying to say the picture you posted was NOT A COVER PLATE?OK, once again...
I certainly poked fun at the idea. But please don't take what I have posted to mean I'm belittling you, but there is no doubt that I was belittling the idea of it being wrong to move insulation.I know that it is the mentality of some of the members of this forum to enforce their argument by trying to belittle their opponent during a debate such as this one. Well to them I simply say your actions speak loudly to a lot of people.
I'm not real clear on what you are saying. Are you trying to say the picture you posted was NOT A COVER PLATE?
Perhaps it was some kind of INSULATING MATERIAL/GASKET THAT GOES BEHIND THE COVER PLATE instead of an actual cover plate? Perhaps we can find out one day. :grin:
Was having to add boxes in attic on a fire damage and inspector said i had to keep them high so could be above insulation. And I thought I also have read it in code but the other replies dont seem to support this . I do know local ahj can call you on it.
Hardly. It is SOP for a lot of jobs. You just have to learn how....because it is near impossible to trouble shoot the hidden boxes
Getting tired of yellow shag? :grin:Thinking about repainting my attic insulation since its a finish.
The issue, however, would be subject to interpretation.