190111-0830 EST
tersh:
You continue to have false impressions because you do not go back to basics.
Look at the GFCI datasheet for the trip time characteristic. There is an inverse time relationship, electronic in this case, relative to current. The 5 mA is after a moderately long time relative to how little time it takes for you to detect a shock. Further you can detect a shock at a much lower level than 5 mA.
See https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3687/65b32d61fb81143356f034aaea68f166bb3d.pdf
1 mA looks to be a better level for detectability for ordinary people. An interesting side note is that John Swets is referenced in this discussion. I first met him in 1953 when I was in a psychology class taught by Wilson (Spike) P. Tanner. Tanner and Swets were both PhD students at the time working on signal detectability, and running vision experiments. I became a subject, about $1 per hour. That summer I started building test equipment for Tanner's experiments.
Note that a 1 mA shock could kill you indirectly. You stand on a ladder, get shocked, fall off, crack your head on the floor, and die.
At 5 mA you will feel a substantial shock.
What is a surge, transient, impulse, RF, etc. Their meanings are all dependent upon context.
More later possibly.
.
Let's say one accidentally touch a live wire with the feet on ground, and the source is 3A. When the sense coil detects 5mA leakage, it triggers the IC to open the relay. But before the relay open. Can't it pass more than 5mA? Maybe 100mA? But 100mA is lethal dose already. So could china made GFCI be slower to respond. How do they test what mA of current are actually passed before the relay open say the trigger ampere is really 5mA?