Liqua Tight flimsy flex fittings

[Sparky555]

Thanks....... I dont plan on using that junk any more, going back to standard liquid tight......the real deal...

Now I got it. You used the cheap fittings and the cheap liquid-tight. We have to use the metal interior liquid-tight with the copper wire in the wrap. I thought that was the only UL listed type (other than premanufactured assemblies).

 

[glene77is]

... the wires inside Type NM-B are not labeled as required by 310.11 so you still have a code violation.
It's even technically a violation to strip out old Romex to make pigtails.
Mark

Busman,

Good point, since we are talking 'technicalities'.

Guess I never checked the wire label itself.

 

[Minuteman]

I thought that was the only UL listed type (other than premanufactured assemblies).

You didn't know that Carflex is UL listed? LFMC (A.K.A. sealtight) and LFNC (A.K.A. Carflex) are both UL listed and very functional for most applications.

 

[Mule]

Would that be known as Seal Tight?

Yes, my bad, around here both names are used Seal Tight and Liguid Tight for the same thing....then the hose type is called "Liqua tight"