kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
Potentially has a violation of 334.15(C) in that drawing.
MIke Holts Daily Graphic
- Thread starter jusme123
- Start date
- Status
kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
This rule not necessary IMO. Is a step in the direction of "lets GFCI protect everything" and has no good basis. Yes I believe there was an electrocution from an AC unit that had a fault and missing or compromised EGC used as justification. Assuring there is sufficient EGC would have also saved that person.
mbrooke
Batteries Included
- Location
- United States
- Occupation
- Technician
- Location
- Illinois
- Occupation
- retired electrician
Just to prevent debris from falling in the pipe. Duct seal does the job.
mbrooke
Batteries Included
- Location
- United States
- Occupation
- Technician
This goes in depth on the topic:
ATS, Grounding Issues & Installation Considerations
ATS, Grounding Issues & Installation Considerations - Download as a PDF or view online for free
www.slideshare.net
ATS, Grounding Issues & Installation Considerations
ATS, Grounding Issues & Installation Considerations - Download as a PDF or view online for free
www.slideshare.net
Dsg319
Senior Member
- Location
- West Virginia
- Occupation
- Wv Master “lectrician”
Is it permissible to have the GEC to not be continuous on a communication system? What if you had a fitting listed for termination of more than one conductor?. I’m just curious.
kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
Typically used/required intersystem bonding devices are exactly what you described.
Just use a second fitting.
mbrooke
Batteries Included
- Location
- United States
- Occupation
- Technician
gadfly56
Senior Member
- Location
- New Jersey
- Occupation
- Professional Engineer, Fire & Life Safety
I like the can of "something" at the bottom right under the floor. Who hasn't seen that at some point? Something, something, "Extra Thick".
- Status