It seems to me plagiarism would be quoting something that was known to have been published or recorded but not giving credit to the source, however making a quote that someone made before but not knowing it had been made would just be the meeting of like minds. :thumbsup:
Why would everyday people care? Conversation would come to an end if we all had to worry about saying something that had already been said. :roll:
So I ask that you watch all threads (I mean all threads) from this point on and make sure a quote is not plagiarized and TIA :thumbsup:
,and refer to other systems for the sake of enlightened comparatives to 'think outta the nec box'....
Got this- can't help but want to call them up. Count the number of incorrect statements:
/QUOTE]
i'm not even going to deal with the subtle linguistics until after you get the solid copper
ground rod driven 8' into the ground. then we can talk linguistics.
i'll wait.
This forum explains it every other day, but your advice is duly noted....so following i would probably dwell on the difference betwixt earthing and that which provides equopotential via bonding pieces/parts
That said the long winded version may end up going down the noodle rathole, because our lovely NEC's grounding /grounded matrix often will disguise what is in reality a return path cloaked in the guise of a GEC.
This is where even a tenured spark such as myself am often at a loss
~RJ~
