Multiconductor cable conduit fill

Status
Not open for further replies.
We're already there at 480v Kwired. The transformer idea had crossed my mind however. It's alright though, we have a Plan B.
 
Interesting discussion, this was the wire I was referring too:

http://www.servicewire.com/serviceplex-v2.php


I looked at a few examples of this. I predicted that both strategy 1 (single conductor at 53% fill) and solution 2 (3-conductor at 40% fill) would yield very similar results.

A borderline example where it would matter, is size #2.

3 qty #2 XHHW-2 conductors fit in 1" RMC at 38.36% fill. Which meets the NEC. Probably not something you'd do in practice, but it meets it nonetheless.

However, given a single conductor based on the OD of SPLEX2/3 of 0.81", if you try to fit it in 1" RMC, you get 58.5% fill. OK for a nipple, but not a long run. You'd need 1.25" RMC at 34% fill.
 
It would of been spun into the cable.
FWIW. I am fairly sure the grounding conductor is not a part of the cable unless it is the same size as the other conductors. If a smaller ground is pulled with this cable off of a separate spool is it now subject to a 31% fill? If it were sheathed?
 
There do exist AC voltage systems at 600V phase to phase. They are rare in the USA, but they do exist.
I realize that, question is would it reduce needed conductor size enough to fit the raceway. I guess it is about a 20% change of voltage, maybe it would be enough.
 
I found a home and garden forum where a little old lady diyer says a multlconductor assembly has to have an overall outer covering to be considered one cable.

I don't suppose you will take that as an authoritive source?

I am guessing prolly not.:D
You leave my grandmother out of this.

My grandmother can kick your grandmother's behind:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top