NEC 110.14 and highly stranded wire on oven

That would be a listing and labeling issue...only permitted if the manufacturer has specified that method of termination for finely stranded conductors. At one time SquareD had an instruction that showed wrapping the finely stranded conductors in copper foil for terminating in set screw connectors. Not sure if they still say that.
I have seen copper foil on generator fine stranded terminations.
 
Every oven for for residental use has flexible metal conduit with finely stranded wire? Since when? I have see a few with this but most are set up for cord and plug use. Can use a 3 wire cord for older 3 wire outlets or a 4 wire cord for newer outlets.
I should have said every double-oven. That is the unit I have. I have a range in the apartment and it has a cord and plug.
 
Oven or range? Every range I've seen has terminals for a cord. Built in ovens tend to have a FMC whip which generally needs to get spliced to tapped in with the cooktop and branch circuit conductors. I haven't had a built in oven for over 30 years, and I don't think I ever took that one apart to know if it was fine strand or not. I assumed they would use AWM or MTW that is 105C.
It is typically AWM, 105C.
 
What problem? Specs allow the use of solid or stranded wire with multiple combinations thereof. You have stranded wire, end of story. If you have a problem, you are probably not striping the conductors correctly or not letting the stranded lead the solid or not twisting the stranded. If after installing the wire nut you can tug either conductor and it doesn't come out, you have done it correctly.

-Hal
Not so. The way UL tests the connectors, they only use Class B and C strands. If the connector is to be used on other classes (high strand) the connector must be tested and listed that way. Typical connectors in the market are only rated for Class B and C. That is why NEC requries the connector to be "identified" for highly stranded wires if it is to be used that way.
 
Chapter 9 Table 10 tells us that for #14 to #2, Class B stranding is 7 strands, and Class C stranding is 19 strands. So if the oven comes with an FMC whip with conductors with more than 17 strands (e.g. 37), then the connection in the outlet box requires a special connector per 110.14.

Cheers, Wayne
That is correct
 
Now find me where the wire nut specs don't allow their use with that wire. It only says they may be used with solid and stranded with no distinction between any particular stranding. So, I take that as saying they are identified as being suitable for this use per 110.14.

In my opinion 110.14 pertains to setscrew, pressure terminals and crimp lugs.

-Hal
The wire nsut specs are confusing in many ways. NEC is very specific about highly stranded wire and the connector requirement.
 
Are you hard wiring this residential oven?
Yes. That is how it comes - with high-strand wires in a flex conduit from the factory. One manufacturer (forgot which one) even said in its installation manual that you should not replace the whip (flex) with a cord and plug.
 
That's not what 110.14 says. It says that for other than Class B and Class C, the connector "shall be identified for the specific conductor class or
classes." So if the whip conductors have class K stranding, then the wirenut packaging needs to say "suitable for class K stranding" or something like that.

Cheers, Wayne
That is correct. The connector must be "identified" as suitable for highly stranded wire.
 
I am just curious with regard to a "wirenut" and class K stranding...... Isnt SO cord or lamp cord ( from a pendant luminaire), also a type K stranding? If so dont we all use a "wirenut" to connect these conductors to building wiring?

Again just curious persuant to the current discussion.


Howard
I have been puzzled by the fact that this problem has not been getting more attention in the past. I believe that highly stranded wires are routinely connected to regular (Class B and C stranded) wires with wire nuts that are only "suitable" for Class B and C strands. Why does this not get attention from the AHJs? I reached out to two AHJ's (chief electricals), and they do not seem to be aware of it. So at first I thought I was losing my mind (which I have, according to the wife). But the more I look at this (and reading UL486, the standard for connectors), I am convinced that manufacturers of connectors only test with Class B and C strands. So the NEC article makes sense.
 
I Haven't seen a highly stranded flexible cord or wire on a range or oven that didn't have a fork crimped terminal for attaching. Most every oven or range I've seen has a terminal block for attachment of supply wiring to the equipment. Only time I've seen a wire nut attempted was someone damaged the factory installed terminal block. Such I believe then becomes a listing violation. Internal connections were all high temperature crimps for the flexible stranded wire.

Have seen someone try to use a welding cable for a generator hookup and use wire nuts. In bottom of enclosure and hanging off the nuts were several sheared strands of the cable. So how many strands of a 50A rated flexible cable that can be removed before it's capacity has been compromised. Correct answer is probably -0-.
 
I Haven't seen a highly stranded flexible cord or wire on a range or oven that didn't have a fork crimped terminal for attaching. Most every oven or range I've seen has a terminal block for attachment of supply wiring to the equipment. Only time I've seen a wire nut attempted was someone damaged the factory installed terminal block. Such I believe then becomes a listing violation. Internal connections were all high temperature crimps for the flexible stranded wire.

Have seen someone try to use a welding cable for a generator hookup and use wire nuts. In bottom of enclosure and hanging off the nuts were several sheared strands of the cable. So how many strands of a 50A rated flexible cable that can be removed before it's capacity has been compromised. Correct answer is probably -0-.
I believe you are correct for ovens and ranges. I have installed quite a few cooktops that came with a Greenfield whip and free conductors (finer than B or C).

Mark
 
Wall ovens and cooktops always come with whips, never terminal blocks.

Wire-nuts may not be listed for the connection but they have been the standard connectors used for 60+ years. I have never run across a problem unless the wrong size connector was used or wires were not stripped long enough.
 
Wall ovens and cooktops always come with whips, never terminal blocks.

Wire-nuts may not be listed for the connection but they have been the standard connectors used for 60+ years. I have never run across a problem unless the wrong size connector was used or wires were not stripped long enough.
You have a good point. I agree that wire nuts are being used in practice to connect these. As to the fact that there has never been a problem, I am not sure. Typically, the way requirements get into the NEC is when something burns up. The point gets raised with the Code Making Panel and they write a rule. There are some areas in NEC that are hard to enforce. Torque on the connections is another area that is hard to enforce, so it gets ignored. But I am not sure if any of this makes it right.
 
Top