I have a designer that has designed a 277/480 service, 400amps with a 4 pole double throw switch in between the CT cabinet and the Service Entrance Disconnect.
This seems like a code violation to me per code 230.82
Any thoughts?
But the service OCPD does not have to be ahead of part of the transfer switch.The service disconnect needs to either be ahead of the ATS or integral to it.
But the service OCPD does not have to be ahead of part of the transfer switch.
You can get service rated manual transfer switches that do not have built in OCPD. They serve as the service disconnect and the service OCPD is located next to the transfer switch.But the transfer switch requires overcurrent protection.
You can get service rated manual transfer switches that do not have built in OCPD. They serve as the service disconnect and the service OCPD is located next to the transfer switch.
Not if it is a service rated switch. The OCPD can be on the load side of a service rated switch.The transfer switch requires overcurrent protection.
Not if it is a service rated switch. The OCPD can be on the load side of a service rated switch.
Can you show where you are getting that from? Or show us a service rated transfer switch that does not come with integral overcurrent protection, or not require it in the utility source.
Not if it is a service rated switch. The OCPD can be on the load side of a service rated switch.
Can you show where you are getting that from? Or show us a service rated transfer switch that does not come with integral overcurrent protection, or not require it in the utility source.
If you look in the UL general directory you will find that the listing allows for service rated ATS without integral OCPD.
But I don't know if any are available or not
The UL Guide Information for Transfer Switches (WPTZ) provides for transfer switches without overcurrent protection.
Do you have a link?